#8 Barack Obama
January 19, 2008 by clander
Because white people are afraid that if they don’t like him that they will be called racist.
-
Blog Stats
- 71,155,209 hits
Upcoming Events
-
-
Subscribe
Archives
Contact Info
-
Top Posts
January 19, 2008 by clander
Because white people are afraid that if they don’t like him that they will be called racist.
Pages: « 396 … 266 265 264 263 262 [261] 260 259 258 257 256 … 1 » Show All
I feel that this blog is right. I’m not say all people just voted for Barack because of his race because that is not true. But when put into a social situation where the other people are saying comments about how much the like Barack and your thinking to yourself ” I voted for the other guy …. ” your most likely going to join in the conversation. You do this because of peer presure. Although most think peer presure only exsits in high school and what not that is not true. Peer presure exsits everywhere. In an fake election in a middle school 94 % where for Barack Obama i can definatly tell you those where not on his political views. Most were on his race and peer presure.
Don’t make me laugh! When, in the history of these United States, have white people done anything for non-white people because of peer pressure?
If you are one of those white folk who voted for Obama because of white peer pressure, then consider yourself an ignorant fool.
Every now and then I’m accused of beating a dead horse by going on and on about Obama and his veering off to the socialist left …okay, actually I’m accused of this almost every day. The problem is that almost every day Obama and gang do something to show that they are all channeling their inner Hugo Chavez and I’m compelled …compelled I tell you, to write about it! In other words, I’d stop beating the horse but it keeps moving!
Take yesterday for example: Yesterday, members of the press were scheduled to meet with the “Pay Czar” (And I’m going to completely ignore the obvious socialist links to having a “Pay Czar” working for the B.O. administration, unaccountable to Congress, who’s job it is to dictate how much American citizens in the privet sector can earn …I’m not going to go into that at all) Anyway, the press pool was informed by the White House that the Fox News organization could no longer conduct interviews with officials (That’s public officials …you know, people who work for us) as a member of the press pool.
For those of you following B.O. firsts …write this one down. This was the first time an Administration tried to ban a complete news organization from the press pool.
Note that the press pool has nothing to do with government except to cover government workings. There is no government oversight of the pool, it is completely organized and directed by the press itself. Members of the pool include ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC and Fox News. These five news organizations “Pool” their talent and disseminate information to all other news groups and to you and me. They are the eyes and ears of the American people.
But B.O. doesn’t like Fox News. Fox News people always ask questions that the Administration finds uncomfortable. They run stories like the ACORN story and the Anita Dunn story and the Van Jones story and the continuing lack of an Afghan strategy story and all these stories plus more shed a bad light on the administration …so the answer, at least for Hugo Chavez and the B.O. administration, is obvious, BAN THE PRESS! Or at least the press that isn’t playing along.
Now for the “credit where credit is due” part … ABC, CBS, CNN and NBC wouldn’t go along with the B.O. ban. People over at those news organizations remembered something about the freedom of the press not being infringed upon and told the White House that if Fox News wasn’t invited than they wouldn’t be coming either. Good for them!
This is madness! We have a White House which is deciding which news organizations are legitimate (The ones that agree with the White House) and which are not legitimate, (The ones that don’t agree with the White House) and the Administration is taking steps to deny access to the workings of our Government to those members of the press who “they deem” unworthy!
This story tells us something else: If you want to hear critical news, which is the kind of news that has been traditionally valued by Americans, Fox News is your best bet.
Now do you see what I mean? I’d stop writing about B.O. and his socialist ways if he’d stop acting like a tin-pot dictator!
Oh paulie4, I love reading your words on B.O., It makes me sooo hot for you. Quote Elmer Fudd somemore big boy.
I hav a lil song I want to dedicate to you.
Well I guess it would be nice
if i could touch your body
i know not everybody
has a body like you
welll
.
but i have to think twice
before i give my heart away
and i know all the games you play
because i play them too
guess i need some time off
from that emotion
time to get my heart up off the floor
cause when the time ……..
Oh paulie4, I love when you touch me like that. You did’nt even let me finish my song.
Touch me in the morning,
then just walk away.
Wow Paulie, I did’nt know you could take it soo deep.
kisses baby, your boyfriend and lover,
Leroy from cell block 8
This is kind of funny. You know how I’m always going on about socialism and communism? Well, there is a piece in the Wall Street Journal today from an Oct 14 article by Hans-Ulrich about the jokes that East Germans used to make about communism before the wall came down.
Apparently the jokes were written down as heard by Western spies as a way of gauging the mood of the East German people. Now the joke files are being released: Here’s what Western spies were hearing:
“Did East Germans originate from apes? Impossible. Apes could never have survived on just two bananas a year.”
“What would happen if the desert became communist? Nothing for a while, and then there would be a sand shortage.”
“Why does West Germany have a higher standard of living than we do? Because communists can’t get work permits there.”
“A new Trabi (East German car) has been launched with two exhaust pipes—so you can use it as a wheelbarrow.”
Sometimes, a joke can reveal a world of truth! Funny stuff.
the funniest thing you ever said paulie4 was also the smartest thing you ever said:
“Wisten to the whythmic whythm of the woodwinds as it wowws awound and awound…and it comes out here!”
Elmer Fudd
Take the views of Economics, Finance, and Accounting students and professors, and ask them their opinion on what is going on in the White House. Also take into account the views of the pentagon.
Shouldnt we trust these people to make the United States economic, financial, accounting, taxing, and military decisions?
Obamas administration is made up of corrupt tax cheats, and people who want to take away our freedom and turn our country into cuba. He is not listening to the people that actually know what they are talking about.
Obama can organize a community. WOW.
Why try to organize something for people if they are just going to tear it apart. If they wanted something nice in their community, they would have worket for it.
You know how when you let an untrained dog into the house, it rips apart pillows and makes a nest out of abunch of trash. Thats because it doesnt care about a nice house.
Thats the truth.
Its not hard to see that, if people want something enough, they will find a way to get it. Therefor if you are from the ghetto and really really want to a nice house you should stop wishing for it and go earn it.
I think wether or not we help these people is a personal choice.
When you walk down the street, and a homeless man asks for change, that should be a personal choice of yours to help him or not.
So, if that is a personal choice, then how do you justify overtaxing (stealing) from the rich and giving it to the poor.
The thing is, a dollar that you earned will have a greater benefit than a dollar not earned.
America needs to get out there and earn dollars. And stop making excuses.
The Beauty about this country is that if you want something bad enough, you can achieve it.
Obama is trying to take away peoples achievements.
paulie4 and James should be lovers.
geez.
Well …I don’t know about that but I am wather wooed with his wascally and witty wetter!
I love when you talk dirty too me Paulie4. Quote more of your mental equals. Yessss, tell me more!
Lest anyone believes that I’ve made this stuff up about paulie4, I will give you the evidence….and I quote our anti-Obama hero verbatim from this date on this Obama Blog:
paulie4 on September 24, 2009 at 6:19 am
“Wisten to the whythmic whythm of the woodwinds as it wowws awound and awound…and it comes out here!”
Elmer Fudd
Paulie, quit writing a ton of shit that nobody cares to read because you use a whole fucking essay to explain one sentence.
Paulie’s “smarter half”, you look like a dumbass when you put then same fucking thing at the end of every single post you make based off a cartoon you watched when you were four.
Why don’t you go somewhere else if you don’t like it here, I find Paulie’s post interesting and informative. There are plenty of other boards for people unable to form a cogent thought.
I think the Elmer Fudd quotes are quite hilarious.
Hey Kevin, “Wisten to the whythmic whythm of the woodwinds as it wowws awound and awound…and it coming out your ass, ya chicken lipped idiot.
Wiss my wasss, ya wasshole.
Hey Kevin, go fuck yourself. I was quoting Paulie4 for your information DUMBASS. I guess your 2nd grade education got the better of you. Learn to read more than one page you dumb muthafucka. Right about now, I find Paulie4 more interesting than you. Wow, thought I would never see the day. Nah, both of you are dumbass blowhards.
yucka yucka yucka
I wonder if pre election B.O. knew that part of the “President” job description would require him to have to, you know, command the military?
Right now, as I write, our troops are waiting for their Commander in Chief to make a decision regarding winning in Afghanistan. They’ve been waiting for a long time …a long time.
The ground commanders seem to know what they need to win the war and they’ve been just mentioning it to B.O, and anyone else that will listen, but B.O. would like to hear from ….ah …everybody first …before he makes up his very intelegent mind. (Note, the high state of B.O.’s intelligence is settled science and there is no need to debate the subject.) No problem, the troops can just hang out and do whatever troops do …play cards …die.
The point is that eventually B.O. is going to come to a decision and I’ll bet it’s going to be a great one because he’s looking at it from every possible angle …win or not win? Do what the Commanders want or give them half of what they want? Maybe he can talk the commanders down to only taking twenty percent of what they want? Say he’ll do what the commander’s want but actually do what will help keep Iowa in play next election? Go play some hoops or give a speech?
I think we’ve all had our fill of decisive military leaders; I’m sure the troops like the break. Hey, this is tough stuff to figure out for a newbie! Give B.O. some slack ….ah jack.
So, let’s all just kick back and wait. B.O. will make a decision and B.O. himself has said that the decision making event will happen pretty darn soon.
I respect your views.
But if you need an entire page to make a point, you’re doing it wrong.
Geez paulie4. No matter how much bullshit you write in criticizing Obama, you still cannot get away from your intellectual level, which I will yet again remind you of:
“Wisten to the whythmic whythm of the woodwinds as it wowws awound and awound…and it comes out here!”
—paulie4 quoting his hero, mentor, and intellectual superior, Dr. Elmer Fudd
Suddenly, all that paulie4 has written is understood.
yucka yucka yucka
Half white. Wholly don’t like him.
wholly not white. Don’t give a fuck what white people like.
fuck off nig
kiss my ass crackah…
Today’s Wall Street Journal has an article written by Peter J. Wallison, titled, “Barney Frank, Predatory Lender” which fits in perfectly with a post that I made here a few days ago.
It’s my contention that our economy works best when there is minimal government involvement. B.O. has made a business out of saying that our current financial mess was caused by unrestrained, greedy, no good capitalists …the truth has been out for a long time but it seems to be just now gaining public attention. The truth is that the Federal Government caused our current economic mess, or as some might say, “Government is not the solution, government is the problem.”
If it’s true that the Federal Government is primarily responsible for our current economy (And it is) it makes B.O.’s drum beat that more government is the answer to our problems, sound rather weak at best and rather manipulative at worst.
A couple quotes from today’s WSJ article:
“Thus, almost two-thirds of all the bad mortgages in our financial system, many of which are now defaulting at unprecedented rates, were bought by government agencies or required by government regulations.”
“it was government policy for these poor quality loans to be made. Since the early 1990s, the government has been attempting to expand home ownership in full disregard of the prudent lending principles that had previously governed the U.S. mortgage market.”
“Fannie and Freddie were subject to “affordable housing” regulations, issued by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), which required them to buy mortgages made to home buyers who were at or below the median income. This quota began at 30% of all purchases in the early 1990s, and was gradually ratcheted up until it called for 55% of all mortgage purchases to be “affordable” in 2007, including 25% that had to be made to low-income home buyers.”
“If the financial crisis was caused by subprime mortgages and predatory lending, the government’s own policies made it happen.”
B.O. and the Democrats in Congress are driving our country into debt and restricting our freedoms by heaping more government on our backs. Liberal policy was the cause, and now we are being told that liberal policy is the only cure.
Paulie 4- Someone said in a previous post that you view the world as black and white, and I couldn’t agree more.
You are so convinced that capitalism and goverment deregulation are the only felicitiously suited means for a robust and capable society; however, you fail to recognize some of the largest economies and most prosperous nations do not practice capitalism.
I’m not here to debate whether capitalism or socialism is the resolve to America’s downtrodden situation because I do not know the answer. (“I am the wisest man alive, for I know one thing, and that is that I know nothing.” -Socrates). Although, I would tend to agree with the consenses that “recession cycles are a normal part of living in a world of inexact balances between supply and demand.” The evanescent economy will do as it will, regardless.
Any person can find legitmate and substantiated evidence throughout history that support their claims of which social system is the most effective and whether government involvement supports or hurts a country’s economy. The following example is only one throughout history. You will find other evidence for and against .
Example:
1930′s The Great Depression: The USA, which pumped money into the society, emerged from the depression much earlier than Canada, which provided very little support to its citizens.
I noticed you provided a synopsis from the WSJ. Everyone should be aware that the WSJ is published by division of the News Corporation, whose CEO and founder is Rupert Murdoch. Murdoch is known for his FAR-right militant political views. Murdoch owns Fox and has been accused for using it to express his political voice. I just mention this so people are aware who is feeding them the information.
You blame the democrats/liberals as the cause for driving our country into debt. However, I must point out that the debt we are currently in was created by G W Bush. Without getting into any detail, I will just mention that the debt went from 3 trillion to 6 trillion while Bush was in office. I’m not saying Obama and the democrats haven’t added to our debt but before we start pointing fingers we should remember that Bush, a republican, has been labeled by his comptroller general, “the most fiscally irresponsible president in history.”
This leads me to my next point about the housing fiasco.
G W Bush said in a 2002 speech
“Owning something is freedom, as far as I’m concerned. It’s part of a free society.” and
“Homeownership is also an important part of our economic vitality”
The American Dream Down Payment fund, which provided financial grants to local governments to help 1st-time home buyers, was established by Bush, not Obama and the liberals.
I don’t find myself strongly moved by your post, Everest, but I’ll try to tidy up a few points.
Concerning the charge that I see things in, “Black and white.” Thank God!
Possessing a “Discerning mind” used to be seen as a great human attribute, the ability to discern between right and wrong, good and evil, etc, was a sign of an advanced character … not any more. Today, to say that one this is good and another is evil, for example, is seen as pure folly, how can one thing be evil and another good, asks the modern world? Who’s to say? Doesn’t good and evil depend upon our points of view? Wasn’t there a great civilization that existed someplace at some time that practiced what we consider evil and did just fine? The relativist is always lost.
The modern Liberal has neither a map, a compass nor a trusted guide and desires all to follow him. A Conservative, which I am, has a map; it’s the Constitution and related documents. The Conservative has a compass, the values of the Judeo/Christian heritage, and we have trusted guides, mostly the founders of our nation. All of this helps to form a conservative’s ideology.
A Conservative almost always knows which way to go, or which policy is a “Good” policy and which is a “Bad” policy because the Conservative can apply his ideology to any policy.
A Conservative believes in personal freedom, personal responsibility, limited government, free markets and a strong national defense. It’s a simple matter to gauge any government policy against this ideology.
Take Government controlled health care: We can look at the policy and ask, “Would Government controlled health care increase personal freedom or limit it? Would it increase personal responsibility or limit it? Would it limit Government or expand government? Would government controlled health care increase free markets or limit them?
While the Liberal is still assuming the lotus position and gazing deeply into the void asking, “Why should we want a limited government anyway?” The Conservative, confident in the truths already proven, has arrived at a sound conclusion: Government controlled health care limits personal freedom, removes responsibility from individuals, increases the size of Government and restricts free markets ….therefore …Government controlled health care is a policy which should be resisted.
All the above to say that being able to learn the lessons of history and being able to apply them, is a good ….if currently unpopular, character trait.
You wrote: “You blame the democrats/liberals as the cause for driving our country into debt. However, I must point out that the debt we are currently in was created by G W Bush.”
Ah, the “Five year old” defense! Perhaps the most common, and in my mind least effective, Liberal defense! When a liberal/Democrat is found doing something which most people would assume to be “wrong” they use this defense “Oh yeah will Jimmy did it too!” Point out the fact that B.O. is about to create a deficit larger than every previous administration’s deficit combined and the Liberal/Democrat is quick to say, “Oh yeah, well W. Bush put us into debt too!”
Two points here: 1. The argument assumes that had W. Bush not been in power, and if a Liberal/Democrat had been President, fiscal discipline would have been achieved. A more silly assumption has not been made. Every budget ever submitted to Congress by W. Bush came back increased by the Democrats with all sorts of government spending. You could even argue that had it not been for W. Bush the deficit would have been much worse. Second point, W. Bush’s budget deficits were primarily caused by TARP and the wars …both of these had wide Democratic support, i.e., Congress approved the expenditure.
You wrote: “1930’s The Great Depression: The USA, which pumped money into the society, emerged from the depression much earlier than Canada, which provided very little support to its citizens.”
A lot of people think that Government spending is what ended the Great Depression. What ended the Great Depression was the Second World War. So, in a sense, yes, government spending helped to get the economy moving. But not in the way most people think …job programs, etc, many believe, kept America’s Depression going long after it should have ended.
Paulie, I’m not sure why I am responding to you because it is apparent that you are incapable of listening with an open-mind or open-heart.
You choose to ignore some of my comments completely. The national debt DOUBLED while Bush was in office, and as I stated in my previous post his comptroller labeled him the most fiscally irresponsible president.
I must throw your own words back at you however. You accuse the liberals of using the “5 year” defense but you’ve already judged and put blame on Obama in 9 months. A bit hypocritical I think.
Just because someone identifies themselves as republican or democrat does not mean their party always has the best interest of anything in mind or that they ALWAYS make the right decisions. I can sit back and differentiate a person’s decisions and actions from my political convictions. I don’t expect that Obama will do everything to my liking but I would hope that conservatives wouldn’t either expect republicans to never make mistakes or to assume that a democrat will always make the wrong choice.
I didn’t add the quote about “America merging from the Great Depression much earlier” as a source of debate… just to point out that there are different views and opinions out there. I was not trying to prove my point for or against.
Your views are rigid and uncompromising; however, I’m assuming you don’t help pass laws and so your opinion and attitude have little to no bearing on the laws of the nation.
And are you implying that every republican is guided by his/her Christian ideals? I sincerely hope not. Also, I never said anything in my post about not being able to discern good and evil but you have used it in another attempt to attack the liberals. Once upon a time Christains thought anyone who was disabled, retarded, not-white, or left-handed was evil. We look back now and shake out head at their naivety. It sounds like you’ve come to the conclusion that Christains are a perfect race now and cannot make errors or misjudgements.
I’m just curious when God came down to talk you? Did he affirm that all republicans are going to heaven and everyone else is going to hell? Or did he tell you that he only loves Christains? I am a liberal and I am a Christain. My relationship with God is personal. I do not appreciate, sir, your assumption that I have no compass to guide me. My heart yearns for God and my everyday decisions and actions are based on this.
Since paulie4 loves to repeat himself with long winded bullshit, I will help the reading public to understand what message he really wants to get across:
We bring you this, paulie4′s most understandable of quotes, as he paraphrases his intellectual hero and mentor, Dr. Elmer Fudd:
“Wisten to the whythmic whythm of the woodwinds as it wowws awound and awound…and it comes out here!”
Suddenly, all that paulie4 has written is understood.
Yes, I think what we have here, ‘Is a failure to communicate.”
I’m sure you’re a well meaning person and I appreciate your posts.
I’ll “try” to respond quickly to your last post.
You wrote: “The national debt DOUBLED while Bush was in office …” Yes, got it the first time. 1. Every budget proposal given to congress was increased by the Democrats. 2. The reason for the deficit was TARP and the wars, both were approved by the Democrats. 3. Constitutionally, Congress controls the budget not the President. 4. I’m not sure what your point is, W. Bush is a Republican but certainly not a Conservative.
You wrote: “You accuse the liberals of using the “5 year” defense …” No, I accused the Liberals of using the “Five year old” defense …as in using a child’s defense.
You wrote: “Just because someone identifies themselves as republican or democrat does not mean their party always has the best interest of anything in mind or that they ALWAYS make the right decisions” I agree. However, ideology …the driving force behind decision making matters greatly. My point is that Conservatives (Often but not always Republicans) have an ideology that allows them to (Often) make decisions that will preserve a free and prosperous America.
You wrote: “Your views are rigid and uncompromising;” In response: Under what circumstances would you be in favor of someone burning down your house with everyone and everything in it? Please express your point of view without being …rigid or uncompromising. After all, can’t we entertain all ideas? Aren’t we Liberal? Do this and then I’ll entertain ideas that support destroying America in a more forgiving tone.
You wrote: “And are you implying that every republican is guided by his/her Christian ideals?” I did not mention, “Christian ideals” I mentioned Judeo/Christian heritage. But no, I’m not implying that. I do believe that to be a Conservative means employing our Judeo/Christian heritage as a guiding compass to help distinguish right from wrong, good from evil, etc.
You wrote: “I’m just curious when God came down to talk you?” Are you being sarcastic or would you like the date?
You wrote: “Once upon a time Christians thought anyone who was disabled, retarded, not-white, or left-handed was evil” (this is not true but lets run with it anyway) A classic relativists line! Of course this logic can be applied to ANY human behavior which is currently deemed “Normal” in order to defend it against ANY system supporting absolute truth. The only logical thing to do is to believe in “No truth” but rather an ever changing set of values and appropriate behaviors. I can just imagine that in ten years people will start having sex with animals and filming the event for their children. On that day I fully expect you to write, “Well you know, Christians thought anyone who was disabled ….” This is exactly why I’ve written that the modern Liberal has no moral compass. What good is a compass that points north one day and south the next?
You wrote: “My relationship with God is personal.” That’s a shame. Our religious heritage stands at the absolute center of our nation’s foundation and the founders didn’t believe in a silent religion. Sharing your faith is a critical element of Christianity and without the Christian religion in America, America will not exist as we have known it.
I would need God’s help to be able to justify being both a Christian and a Liberal. I fully understand that though the miracle of moral gymnastics a Christian can justify voting for B.O., a man who was the most consistent supporter of on-demand abortion of anyone in Congress or the Senate. A man who supports abortion before birth, during birth and even after a child is born. A man whose views and votes on abortion are monstrous. I understand that the modern smorgasbord Christian can buy into a homosexual marriage being the same as a marriage between a man and a woman, support teaching about homosexuality in grade schools, support banning prayer in schools, support removing stem cells from a living child, support socialist economics, support doctor assisted suicide, support and defend pornography, etc, etc …I suppose the modern Christian can even feel good about having a President who although running as a Christian himself, after ten months in Washington still can’t seem to find a Church to go to! I guess I should just admire the modern Liberal/Christians … flexibility.
Let’s hope that God isn’t as dogmatic as I am …for both our sakes.
I liked the last line of your post, and I believe you.
Since paulie4 loves to repeat himself with long winded bullshit, I will help the reading public to understand what message he really wants to get across:
We bring you this, paulie4’s most understandable of quotes, as he paraphrases his intellectual hero and mentor, Dr. Elmer Fudd:
“Wisten to the whythmic whythm of the woodwinds as it wowws awound and awound…and it comes out here!”
Suddenly, all that paulie4 has written is understood.,,
I really don’t get you. You ramble on and on, pushing the same point. I just wanted to point out that there are different opinions out there and that not everyone always makes the right decision based solely on if they are republican or democrat.
I’m telling you that it’s ok to take a break from pushing your political agenda on everyone once-in-awhile.
BTW, It is common knowledge that God DOES want a personal relationship with us. Pick up a bible or talk to your any theologian and s/he will tell you what I have just said.
I am open to listening to other opinions and I try not to judge people based on color, race, sex, age, religion, or political stance.
I have nothing more to say to you and I sincerely hope anyone who has read these posts do not reply to you anymore either. Hopefully if everyone ignores you, you will go away. It’s not that sharing your opinions is wrong but you have a way of almost making it personal and subtelty attacking any person who disagrees with you. It’s obvious you are a steadfast republican and no one, not even God himself, could open your mind.
Hey Everest, are you implying that you know what is in the mind of God? To say that God could’t change paulie’s mind is sacrilage. I’d think that someone that tells others to “pick up a Bible” would know that.
to right-on-right: I thought about my comment about God not being able to change Paulie’s mind after I published my post and felt it was not the appropriate way to express my thoughts. I should have said Paulie would follow Hitler if he came back wrapped in the American flag, and conservatism written on his sleeve.
Oh, and I don’t know what is in the mind of God but I do know what is in the heart of God. The same thing that he want’s in our hearts – love and compassion. I’m glad you are such an expert on what a person who picks up a bible should or should not know.
What is this, “Thing” people (Especially Liberal people) have with Hitler?
I was thinking about this the other day and came across the following quote by Mike Godwin:
“As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one”
Never were truer words written. The funny thing about Liberal/Democrats using the Hitler analogy of course is that Hitler, as you may recall, popped out of the Socialist movement.
The Nazis were the, “National Socialist German Workers Party” movement not the, “Give more freedom and responsibility to the individual and practice the art of limited government with free markets movement” which might be longhand for the American Conservative Movement.
The evolution of the Socialist movement into the Fascist movement is well chronicled by Jonah Goldberg in his book, Liberal Fascism.
Socialists (Read “Modern Democrats”) believe in giving increasing power to the government, reportedly to solve social issues. Besides not being able to actually solve the social issues they say that they want to solve, the problem is that once Socialists manage to set up a society such that the government has great power, the welfare of the people is dependant upon who’s in office. This is why I say that a socialist government is always just a step away from being a police state.
Just as the mob can elect a B.O., a man with little experience, questionable associations and no unique accomplishments, the mob can also elect a Hitler, also a man of little experience, questionable associations and no unique accomplishments, and in such a case, if the government is not limited, if it’s power over the individual is great, than the harm such a person could do is also great. This is exactly why the founders of our nation believed in limited government. A limited government is a protection; it protects all of us from the affects of a truly vile person coming to power. It is this protection which the modern Liberal/Democrat is seeking to remove.
A conservative believes in limited government, a modern Democrat believes in an increasing government …so who’s more likely to follow a Hitler?
Why OH why must we suffer this repetitive, boring, mush mouth gobbeldee gook of paulie4? Does he believe that his repeating over and over the same ole bullshit will make bullshit come true?
I am disheartened until…..these magic words of clarity uttered in a moment of passing intelligence was spoken by paulie4:
“Wisten to the whythmic whythm of the woodwinds as it wowws awound and awound…and it comes out here!”
Suddenly, all that paulie4 has written is understood.,,
I truly hope that you keep it up paulie, although, youshould know better than to use facts with a lib. Libs don’t see facts as facts, they see them as personal attacks against themselves, and if that idiot picked up a news paper and read some facts(like the ones reported by the lib press during the bush administration, about how GW tried to limit motgage-lending to those that couldn’t afford it, or articles how he vetoed spending bills that congress overturned) he might learn something.
hey sean, you need the momentary wisdom of paulie4, when he uttered these immortal words:
“Wisten to the whythmic whythm of the woodwinds as it wowws awound and awound…and it comes out here!”
Suddenly, all that paulie4 has written is understood…..and all i can say is, HUH???!!!
Calling me an idiot sounds awfully personal to me. We may disagree with one anothers political views but it does not mean we can’t have a respectful conversation. One thing I will say about Paulie is at least s/he never got “mean”. Maybe made it a tad personal but s/he never called me, personally, an idiot.
I don’t think conservatives or republicans always make bad decisions or have bad ideas. I think conservatives use to try and conserve with they preceived to be good and I respect that. I have a problem with people such as yourself who use school yard bullying to make your point.
Thanks Sean. I hope you keep writing too.
Well, no hard feelings, perhaps we’ll tangle again sometime.
to ‘view from mt. everest’: You could have saved an hour of your life by just reading one sentence on paulie4.
paulie4 on September 24, 2009 at 6:19 am
“Wisten to the whythmic whythm of the woodwinds as it wowws awound and awound…and it comes out here!”
Elmer Fudd
Anyone who quotes elmer fudd in an intellectual conversation is worse that dat waskely wabbit he twases.
To ‘view from mt. everest’:
Why in the world are you using your intelligence to reason with a person who’s mental hero is Elmer Fudd???
Paulie4 has not said anything profound or reasonable with the exception of one shining intellectual moment, when he stated the following:
“Wisten to the whythmic whythm of the woodwinds as it wowws awound and awound…and it comes out here!”
—paulie4 quoting his hero, mentor, and intellectual superior, Dr. Elmer Fudd
Suddenly, all that paulie4 has written is understood.
paulie4 forgot that this was a blog and not his own personal novel, so let us remind him of the good old days when his writings were simple and they also reflected his intelligence, shall we? Paulie4, remember your deep thoughtful words you quoted from your intellectual mentor and peer, Dr. Elmer Fudd?
“Wisten to the whythmic whythm of the woodwinds as it wowws awound and awound…and it comes out here!”
Suddenly, all that paulie4 has written is understood.
yucka yucka yucka
the only things that fits perfectly with any post you make paulie4 are your seminal words which reflects your total intelligence and are immortalized for all to read:
“Wisten to the whythmic whythm of the woodwinds as it wowws awound and awound…and it comes out here!”
Suddenly, all that paulie4 has written is understood.
yucka yucka yucka
He is sooooo right!!!!!I agreee 100%. Oh, and I’m not white. And I think white people need to realize that if they are being forced to like someone in fear of being accused of racist, then their accuser is committing an act of racism themselves which is worth calling out on. I think people don’t really realize that anti-white is in itself a form of racism. We live in year 2009 approaching 2010 not in the pages of history. What happened then on the subject of slavery and oppression and blah blah is just that -history. So, for god sake people, stand up for yourselves. Find your backbone again like your ancestors did but minus the ‘world domination’ attitude co’z seriously this is not Disney world. Everyone is entitle to their opinion, religion, culture, etc even though they may seem crazy to you.
Nobody can force a white person to like anyone, so get off your high horse charlize. And you being not white does not qualify you as some expert on Obama. I’ve never met a white person who was forced by a non-white person to believe in anything or anyone. And If you know such a white person, then you’ve met a fool.
And you seem to not be a very bright non-white person to think otherwise. Since when did white folk need a non-white (you) to defend them?
It’s obvious that you are not a non-white american, because only a non-white who is not american could make such foolish comments. For this, you will be granted a pass this time.
Yes, I would agree with Uh…. It’s interesting how people are convinced of things that I nor anyone I know have ever witnessed. I’ve NEVER met a white person who felt pressured by their peers to vote for Obama for fear of being called racist. I’ve only heard people accuse other people of it.
Just like everyone is afraid our country will turn into a socialist society. I don’t know about you but my life is absolutely NO DIFFERENT today then it was a year ago. Is yours?
Behold! Paulie4 will attempt to educate all by writing long winded blah blah blah blah blah extended exercises in lip service on subjects he pretends to understands. Then, in one shining moment, paulie4 has an intellectual breakthrough!!
He quotes his intellectual hero and mentor, Dr. Elmer Fudd:
“Wisten to the whythmic whythm of the woodwinds as it wowws awound and awound…and it comes out here!”
Suddenly, all that paulie4 has written is understood.
yucka yucka yucka
Pages: « 396 … 266 265 264 263 262 [261] 260 259 258 257 256 … 1 » Show All