Feed on
Posts
Comments

#101 Being Offended

To be offended is usually a rather unpleasant experience, one that can expose a person to intolerance, cultural misunderstandings, and even evoke the scars of the past.  This is such an unpleasant experience that many people develop a thick skin and try to only be offended in the most egregious and awful situations.  In many circumstances, they can allow smaller offenses to slip by as fighting them is a waste of time and energy.  But white people, blessed with both time and energy, are not these kind of people.  In fact there are few things white people love more than being offended.

Naturally, white people do not get offended by statements directed at white people.  In fact, they don’t even have a problem making offensive statements about other white people (ask a white person about “flyover states”).  As a rule, white people strongly prefer to get offended on behalf of other people.

It is also valuable to know that white people spend a significant portion of their time preparing for the moment when they will be offended.  They read magazines, books, and watch documentaries all in hopes that one day they will encounter a person who will say something offensive.  When this happens, they can leap into action with quotes, statistics, and historical examples.  Once they have finished lecturing another white person about how it’s wrong to use the term “black” instead of “African-American,” they can sit back and relax in the knowledge that they have made a difference.

White people also get excited at the opportunity to be offended at things that are sexist and/or homophobic.  Both cases offering ample opportunities for lectures, complaints, graduate classes, lengthy discussions and workshops.  All of which do an excellent job of raising awareness among white people who hope to change their status from “not racist” to “super not racist.”

Another thing worth noting is that the threshold for being offended is a very important tool for judging and ranking white people. Missing an opportunity to be outraged is like missing a reference to Derrida-it’s social death.

If you ever need to make a white person feel indebted to you, wait for them to mention a book, film, or television show that features a character who is the same race as you,  then say “the representation of <insert race> was offensive and if you can’t see that, well, you need to do some soul searching.”  After they return from their hastily booked trip to land of your ancestors, they will be desperate to make it up to you.  At this point, it is acceptable to ask them to help you paint your house.


3 bloggers like this post

2,459 Responses to “#101 Being Offended”

Pages: « 8111 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 [1] Show All

hahahahaha! Funny post! White people get offended when you accuse them of being too “white”. But they take it as a compliment when you accuse them of being too “black”, too “asian”, or any other thing having to do with other cultures.

My white friends, you are so transparant (figuratively of course).


Calmudphunkie on May 30, 2008 at 4:23 pm

*transparent*
I’m not white but it bothers me when people spell incorrectly… typos are usually okay.


 

You haven’t hung around the right white people. There are plenty of whites who will knock your block off if you called them black. Although, these same white people think most other whites are pussies.


 

A-MEN A-MEN AMEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEENZ!


 
 

Shouldn’t this blog be titled ‘Stuff Caucasion People Like’?


Should actually be “Stuff Hipsters Like”


 
marvin berry on May 28, 2008 at 4:05 pm

it would, but white people arent offended by being white.


marvin berry on May 28, 2008 at 4:08 pm

arent offended to be called white.


But they are offended when you call Michael Jackson white.


I don’t get offended when someone calls Michael Jackson white: he’s clearly left his black self behind. The problem is that, while he may have been white at some point, at this point he has crossed over into a new specie entirely. He’s closer to a living, breathing ghoul than any proper human being.


Micheal Jackson is an “Uh-Oh” Oreo, white on the outside, black on the inside………….and you know those little blue eyed blonde haired kids aint his……

What i dont get is why black people still like him, sure he had great music, but im not gunna buy thriller again to give his perverted ass more money. Im pretty sure white people hate micheal, i do know black people hate him, but they forgive way to damn often, if they didnt forgive so much, there would be less violence in the world because if you forgive a killer, he will think its ok to kill again etc.


 
Portnoy's complaint on May 29, 2008 at 3:55 pm

You dumbshit. Even if Jackson’s “skin color” became White, his offspring would be Negro.

Skin color has nothing to do with it.

Vijay Singh is blacker than Obama, but everyone knows it’s Obama that is the negro.


Vijay? Obama? What do they have to do with this


 
Christian Facial on May 13, 2009 at 10:35 pm

người hay chửi rủa


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Oh yeah. My husband, who is white, but not a White Person, once got a lecture after describing someone as a “black guy”. Unfortunately for him, he learned that terminology from his wife – a non-hyphenated black American woman.

I’m happy he was able to make someone’s day by offending them.


I wouldn’t get offended by the term “black guy” per se, but it does depend on the context in which it was used. Black people like myself often get offended if a racial description is given where none was warranted.

For example, “This black guy just came in and bought a car charger.” What the hell does the guy being black have to do with him buying a car charger?! Statements like this will blatantly irritate me because it a reminder of how race-conscious some people can be.

I long for the day when I can be described merely as a “hot chick” and people leave out the adjective, “hot BLACK chick.”


I agree.

Thats the main reason it shocks me everytime I am asked to disclose my race in situations where it shouldn’t matter.

Like this blog, for example.

Hello, this is the internet, im not on webcam, you can’t see my skin.

Why do people think my skin colour is relevant!?!?


 

Yeah, it’s just to add some detail so you can imagine the scene you always enter the most vivid thing about the person. I’m sure it’ll happen one day it might be This old woman instead of This old black woman though :p


 

Hmm… “This red-haired guy just came in and bought a car charger”? It’s a description of what the guy looks like, so you can more easily figure out which guy they mean. Seems innocent enough.


 
 

yeah fuck that shit.
we call it black. the AA thing
is GROTESQUELY annoying…


 

Technically calling someone who is black and born in America, an African America is incorrect. They are American, and almost all the black people in America have never even been to Africa. You dont call white people European-American do you?

Calling Black people “Black” has actually been used for thousands of years, dating back to the ancient Egyptians, who were the first people to designate race and geographical location. They referred to themselves as “Red” people, from egypt, because there skin tone was a darkish pink to red, the people from the north, europeans were “White” because they looked white, even though only a few white people are actually very pale, the people south of Egypt were “Black” because they were dark, even though a small portion were actually very dark, they referred to people from east Asia as “Yellow” even thou only a small portion were actually yellow. So, when they were describing someone from that part of the world, say eastern asia, europe, egypt, or mid to southern africa, they would just say their color, and people would know who they were referring to.

To go even deeper into the subject, there is actually only one race, and thats the human race. People with different pigmentation are that way due to evolution from the environment. More sun, darker skin, less sun, lighter skin, etc. While black people can get sun burnt, its not nearly as common as white people getting sun burnt, because black people are lucky enough to have a built in sunscreen.

Next time your husband says “black people”, he is not using it in a derogatory way (unless he has anger in his voice) because its perfectly exceptable, and has been used for thousands of years, just like “white people”.

Im to white to function…………………………………………………….


Christian Facial on May 13, 2009 at 10:50 pm

Technically, “African American” is absolutely correct: people whose ancestors lived in Africa. Our *specific* use is incorrect, however, since all Americans are African Americans.


Christian Facial on May 13, 2009 at 10:54 pm

“DNA evidence indicates that modern humans originated in east Africa about 200,000 years ago. . . . Anatomically modern humans first appear in the fossil record in Africa about 130,000 years ago. . . . Research also located the origin of modern human migration in south-western Africa, near the coastal border of Namibia and Angola.” (Wikipedia entry for *human*)


 
 
Portnoy's complaint on May 28, 2008 at 9:29 pm

If your White husband married a negro, and produced mulatto offspring, then he forfeited his White credentials long ago.

He is no longer relevant to a discussion on a White blog.


Portnoy, I’ve been reading your ***crap*** for several weeks now. Why do you write such mean-spirited and hateful garbage? You’re actually hurting your “cause” by making white people look bad. Take your meds.

I don’t want to join hands with everyone and sing _Cumbiya_. At 49 I’ve been screwed too many times and have become too cynical. I wish that I could truthfully say that I am without prejudice but it just wouldn’t be true. I freely admit that there are certain groups in America that I wish weren’t here, to include all the badly behaved white people. But seriously, you aren’t helping white people with your hate-filled propaganda.

As an aside, I’ve gone to great lengths to teach my children to not be prejudiced. It probably hasn’t done much good. Two black kids beat my youngest son up. They did that because they wanted his seat on the school bus and he refused to move (there were plenty of empty seats that they could’ve chosen). A couple of years later two older black guys broke into his locker at a 24-Hour-Fitness and stole everything of value. (Security camera taped it). A black girl stole my mother’s wallet in a grocery store. (Security camera taped it). And there have been other incidents like those. There are certain harsh truths that the bleeding-hearts insist on denying.

You want to help your “group?” Practice WWJD. Hell, just practice common decency; treat others the way that you would like to be treated. While in the army three words were drilled into me relentlessly: “Lead by example.”

–Jeff in Houston, Texas


Jeff, you sound like a pretty honest guy. And kudos to you for instilling good old-fashioned family values.

I sit here with an odd sensation… wanting to apologize for the ridiculous behaviour of those two black boys who beat your son up because I share a common racial origin with them, but at the same time, knowing that I don’t know these boys… never met them… wouldn’t have anything to do with them or anything in common with them outside of similar melanin content, even if I had. So why should I feel so personally ashamed and responsible for what happened to your son?

The way there are badly behaved white people who poorly represent your race, the same can be said of black people. Please don’t make it worse by sort of, twisting the knife, so to speak, and saying you think we should all leave N. America.

For the record, I’m not asking any modern day white people to apologize for slavery, so why then should I be made to feel like a criminal for the reprehensive acts of the impoverished few?

Yes, I wasn’t impoverished growing up. Nor was Barack Obama, nor was his wife Michelle, nor was Rissi Palmer (the black country singer). People will behave in accordance of what is expected of them and are hugely influenced when given a basic economic advantage from the beginning. If you watch this special currently airing on MSNBC.com “Multiracial in America” (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24765917/) you will see a white woman with black children who pulled them out of school and had them home-schooled because she perceived that less was being expected of them, and she wanted them to be educated to their full potential, which she knew was great. It’s probably because she is white that she was able to see the difference in treatment, in comparison to her own experience with teachers.

Throwing money at Missy Elliott will not magically turn her into Gwyneth Paltrow at this stage in her life; conversely, Traci Bingham will not suddenly turn from a Paris Hilton-type into ghetto fabulous if hers gets taken away. It’s all in how you were reared and the opportunities you had growing up and the expectations placed on you (from your immediate neighbourhood/community, to your family, to your teachers, to the media and greater society). Just something to think about before making your own, more subtle, albeit equally prejudiced remarks.

Have I encountered racism in my life? Yes, of course I have. Do I hate white people? No, of course not. Because anyone with an above-average IQ understands the value of the individual. And also, it’s a fact that there are things to be admired in every race, even if it’s only certain physical attributes.

That’s all I wanted to say.


 

This is the most intelligent mature considered comment I have read on this subject in this forum to date. Thank you Jess.


 

Jess, thank you for your response. I am indeed honest-to-a-fault. Throughout my life it has been both an asset and a liability depending on the circumstances.

You certainly have no need to apologize for or feel guilty about the actions of others. But I understand what you mean. The Portnoys of this world embarrass me. I freely admit that I have some prejudices which I’ve been careful to not reveal to my sons. Any prejudices that I still have at age 49 are probably here to stay.

I didn’t say that I thought that certain groups should leave America. I said that I wished that certain groups weren’t here. (Do a lot of american-indians wish that every other group would leave? I don’t know). Frankly, the 5-or-6-million muslims in America make me nervous, however irrational that may be, but I know that the overwhelming majority of them want the same things that you and I do: peace, prosperity and to provide a good life for our children. (Bad news: social security & medicare are going to bankrupt us).

Re. “…reprehensible acts of the ***impoverished*** few.” My mother and her nine siblings grew up in ***REAL*** poverty in depression-era east Texas. None of them became criminals. Poverty doesn’t cause or force people to commit crimes. If it did then why aren’t _all_ poor people criminals?

My worthless father deserted my mother & I when I was ten. She wasn’t in a position to do anything for me. I put myself through college by first spending three years in the army and earning the G.I. Bill education benefits (and saved some money); was in the army reserve while in college; worked jobs during summer- & Christmas-break; received no grants or scholarships; did without a car until my last year of college; took out no student-loans and when I graduated I had zero-debt of any kind whatsoever.

There are 21 words that my sons have heard so many times that I just _know_ they’re going to have them put on my tombstone: “Each and every day we are presented with choices; we make our choices and then we have to live with them.” As Lawrence Fishburne said in the second _Matrix_ movie “It begins with choice.”

Anyone who claims that they commited a crime because they were/are poor–”boo-hoo”– needs to be bitch-slapped and sent to prison. Worthless pieces of ***shit***.

–Jeff in Houston, Texas


 
 

Right on Jeff! I always enjoy your comments and usually can’t stand Portnoy’s crap. He’s soooo offensive.
Love, Suz


Squizan/Suz, I’m pleased to hear that you enjoy my comments. You can be the president of my fan-club; ha-ha-ha.

Yeah, I have my flaws but the blatant racists, like Portnoy, make me groan.

I can’t help but wonder which ones you’ve read. (Please don’t feel the need to list them). I think that my comments under topic #62, “Knowing what’s best for poor people,” were especially good, as in a valid teaching-point.

I always use the name Jeff (there’s a Jeffrey and a jeff here) and almost always sign off with “Jeff in Houston, Texas.”


Portnoy's complaint on May 29, 2008 at 3:58 pm

Jeff, it is guys like you who have let Houston become the hellhole it now is.

In the 1960′s it was a great place for White children and families. No longer.

Two blacks beat up your son. Hello? McFly?

Are you stupid or something? Jeff: for a fool, you really are arrogant.


No i fear just the opposite. People like you make this world the hellhole it is. Why do you pick on other races? weather a white person or a black criminal shoots or robs you the result is the same. You’ll still be just as dead or just as broke. That race as a whole did nothing to you and whites as a whole did nothing to them. This is apparently not well known but there were also irish slaves. Yet when you think of slaves you only ever think of “black” people. Skin tone isnt important your personality is what decides who you are, not what color your skin is. In conclusion you sir are a disgrace, an annoyance, and an arrogant asshole. go get a life and leave us alone. Thank you, and have a good day ^.^


 

Portnoy, you are one name calling son of a bitch.


Plus, he uses terms like “mulatto” and “negro”. Who even uses those words anymore?

Portnoy, you talk like my grandpa. What are you, a Confederate Army veteran? The South lost 147 years ago, my good man. It may be time to move on with the whole “white power” thing.

Just had to pile on. And wait, I’m sure somebody’s pointed this out, but wasn’t Portnoy Jewish? And a compulsive masturbator? Hardly seems the right ethnicity for the screen name of a racist… But I guess you got the compulsive masturbator thing right.

I mean, you sure post _here_ a lot, anyway.


 
 
Portnoy's complaint on May 29, 2008 at 4:03 pm

PS Jeff: You are a flat-out failure of a father to even put your son in such a position in the first place.

You are really stupid, aren’t you?

Keep on believing the “Diversity” myth, even as your own son gets assaulted. Did it ever occur to your raisin-sized brain, that the 2 blacks who beat your son were “racist”?

You make me sick, you idiot.


Portnoy, my sons, ages 19 & 21, would tell you that I was/am a great father to have. They want & have nothing to do with their bipolar whack-job mother.

Re. “…put your son in such a position…”: if I could’ve afforded private schools I would have. I lived in the best part of town that I could afford to (which wasn’t the very best part of town). As described above the two bullies were dealt with decisively.

I don’t believe the diversity myth at all. Honestly, I don’t like diversity. Human nature is that we want to live with, work with and be surrounded by people who are as much like we are as possible, racially, ethnically, culturally, linquistically, religously, politically, education-level, etc. Societies that are homogenous tend to be harmonious.

When a white person chants “diversity” they’re either being PC (lieing) or they live in some sort of ivory tower (gated community) and if forced to actually get out and mingle with “the diverse” would quickly change their minds. When a non-white person chants “diversity” they really mean affirmative-action or “let my relatives come over too.”

Prior to going into the army in ’76 at the tender age of 17 I had scarcely encountered a minority (or a “dirty white”). Talk about “The Hills Have Eyes!!!” I’m talking effing _mutants_–black, white and brown! Folks, listen to me: if you think that diversity is a good thing it’s because you haven’t gotten out and actually experienced diversity. “Be afraid, be very afraid.”

But all the different groups are here, none of them are leaving and except for a few kooks like yourself, Portnoy, and the “Reverand” Wright most of us manage to get along. Rodney King, of all people, may have said it best when he said “can’t we all just get along?”

I’m not happy with our immigration policy. I don’t have a shred of evidence to support the following, it’s just a gut-feeling: the population of the U.S. should’ve topped-out at around 250-million. After that immigration should’ve been limited to the following five categories (in no particular order):

1. When a U.S. citizen legally adopts a foreign child.
Should be legally & financially responsible for them
until age 21 or for five years after they come to the
U.S., whichever comes first.

2. When a U.S. citizen marries a non-citizen. (I’ve got
a thing for latin women, myself).

3. When a non-citizen has a significant amount of
capital to invest. Could be on some kind of sliding-
scale, for example, 2-million dollars for a minimum of
three years to 1-million dollars for six years.

4. Certain skills that we have a shortage of. I’m
thinking Nobel-prize winning researchers, iranian or
pakistani nuclear scientists who want to defect, that
sort of thing.

5. When a non-citizen provides a valuable service for
the U.S.: tips us off to a terrorist plot, the
interpreters in Iraq & Afghanistan.

Food for thought. –Jeff in Houston, Texas

P.S. Portnoy, did you take your meds?


get it riot on July 17, 2009 at 9:52 pm

It was Reginald Denny (after being pulled from his truck and beaten) who famously said, “Why can’t we all just get along?”

Rodney King said, “Come on guys, I’m not full of candy.”

Thought I’d clear that one up.


 

Jeff, you are just as offensive as Portnoy. Neither one of you are representative of anything “positive”. As I continue to read your comments, it seems as if you get off on letting your flaws (i.e., racism) run wild once you’ve warmed up to the topic at hand.

Any hoot, for the record, white people IMO are not so great and to your point about living around “non-whites”, if I had my choice, I’d live homogeneously with black people and it’s because I can not stand people like you (i.e., white).

Peace.


Kikoe, I’m the slightest bit sorry that you find me as offensive as Portnoy. Portnoy seems to be motivated by pure hate–and Portnoy, I don’t claim to be able to read your mind–whereas my position is based on pragmatism, I call’em like I see’em. I think that I’m more honest & objective than someone like Portnoy.

If being a racist means that you believe that your race is superior to all others then I am not a racist. The same research that indicates that the average white person is somewhat more intelligent than the average black person also indicates that the average asian is somewhat more intelligent than the average white person. So if there’s a “master race” apparently it isn’t mine.

Btw, in both the millitary and in my civilian career I’ve encountered a great many black people, both men and women, that were demonstrably smarter than I am. When they were my supervisor I had no problem with it.

As an aside, and this isn’t profound, intelligence manifests itself in different ways. Shakespear couldn’t do what Neuton did who couldn’t do what Mozart did who couldn’t do what Edison did who couldn’t do what Einstein did and so on. My hat is off to whoever invented the frozen pizza and the tv-remote-control; many thanx.

There’s no doubt in my mind that main-stream American culture, which some derisively refer to as “acting white,” is demonstrably better than “black culture” and many non-western cultures. I could write a lengthy essay elaborating on that theme but don’t feel like it right now. “When in Rome…”

I certainly don’t blame you for wanting to live with nothing but black people. Strange how so many black people who achieve success promptly leave the “hood” to go live in areas that’re predominantly white. Rhetorical question: why don’t they stay and and try to help their community?

Indeed Peace


(Comments wont nest below this level)

zing! i think you won that one jeff. good for you. yeah they know full well what black culture is and you’re right, it doesn’t even need to be said. no more excuses folks, black america can’t blame everybody else anymore. time for personel inventory and a new story that doesn’t include victimhood in it.


 

Rogers, okay, okay: I wrote Neuton when I should’ve written Newton, as in Sir Isaac Newton. And you’re correct: mainstream can be written without the hyphen.

Nope, not on drugs. The reference to frozen pizza and the remote-control was a joke. Guess I should’ve put a smiley-face on the end.

Mainstream American culture…it’s like beauty or love, it can’t necessarily be measured, I just know it when I see/feel it. Norman Rockwell depicted certain aspects of it. A movie like _Juno_ or _The Accidental Tourist_ shows a glimpse…_Leave it to Beaver_. I suspect that you know very well what I mean by Mainstream American culture.

I further suspect that you and kikoe are about as “prejudiced” as I am. (Can’t be measured). I further suspect that you and kikoe have experienced a case of “the truth hurts.”

Honestly, I don’t think that I’m prejudiced. My opinions about trends in certain groups aren’t a result of pre-judging, they’re a result of 32 years of fairly objective observation beginning when I went into the army in ’76.

Yeah, I’m Obama’s typical white person. And Jesse Jackson with his (in)famous quote about hearing footsteps behind him, turning around and seeing someone white and feeling relieved is the typical black person.


 
Senor Rogers on June 2, 2008 at 8:02 am

Jeff, firstly, who the hell is Neuton? Secondly, I’m glad you didn’t feel like writing an essay: not hat I would read it, but you really don’t write that well to begin with and I wouldn’t want you to waste your time.
Are you on drugs or something?
Thank God for the remote control and frozen pizza? Um, OK, I guess some of us are easily impressed with things that have been around for decades</i). My hat comes off for the light bulb and K-Y Jelly.
Lastly, I’d like to know what mainstream American culture is. Is this the culture of San Mateo or Miami? What about Bangor and Rapid City? Is the culture of the people in Denver mainstream? Maybe Taxarkana culture is mainstream. Which one is better? There are plenty of people on this planet who do not live in your so-called mainstream culture, billions to be a little more precise. I think they’d have something to say about which culture is better.


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Camel Toes '87 on May 29, 2008 at 8:34 am

How can anyone determine what a man 2000 years ago would do today? If anyone–and I mean ANYONE can even dare say they know what Jesus would do, they’re deluded and hopeless.

Go ahead and teach your children tolerence and they will tolerate getting beaten up and robbed. Teach them self-defense and to trust themselves and themselves alone, and they will be far better off. Teach them as much as you can about common sense (ultimately, that comes from within) and to stay away from situations that would excercise their ability to tolerate.

Why put all your faith in an archaic idea that has never worked?

The definition of insanity is to do the same thing over and over and over and over again, expecting a different outcome each time.


The Bible says that God is the same yesterday, today, and forever, and that there is nothing new under the sun. The Lord Jesus was God come in the flesh. He is called Imanuel, which means, “God with us”.


 

I don’t think you understand the concept of the saying what would Jesus do, overall just do good

YOU my friend have a first class trip to Hell with that attitude…

Say hi to the devil for me kay?


 

Camel Toes, there is much truth in your second paragraph.

I don’t agree with your first & third. I’ve read the Bible cover-to-cover four times and I think that I have an excellent idea of what Jesus would do or advocate doing in various moral & ethical situations. Despite that my success-rate in practicing the principle of WWJD is considerably less than 100%.

My son didn’t tolerate getting beaten up. One of the kids that assaulted him was tried & convicted as an adult for assault. He gets to go through life and apply for jobs with that on his record. That took care of him.

The other kid Andrew took care of on the _last_ day of school. He walked up to him, identified himself and informed him that he wanted to settle accounts. (He didn’t sucker-punch him from behind like the two of them did to him). The kid agreed and Andrew proceeded to clean-his-clock, as the saying goes. (In the several months between the assault and that fight Andrew had had a major growth-spurt). It turns out that the poor, disadvantaged, historically-wronged sociopath wasn’t so tough in a one-on-one fair fight. Sometimes the good-guys win in the end.

–Jeff in Houston, Texas


 
 
 
gosh, you are dumb on May 29, 2008 at 12:02 am

you married a negro


that was out of the blue O.o what the hell does the color matter. As mentioned in one of the topics the steriotype pf a white person apparently likes statistics. But studies show that inner racial breeding strengthens our genes. The tower of babel was where languages and “races” formed in other words the “ultimate race” would most likely consist of all these races. Lol so that was a good thing.


 
 
 
 
 
 

Being offended allows us to better be experts on the cultures of others.


I always thought that sense of righteous indignation you got from being offended on someone else’s behalf was a source of green energy. And of course it’s renewable.


Allison, that comment was funny as hell! And so true…


 
 
 

Just mention “Heart of Darkness” or “Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” and that will start it off.


OMG dont even start Heart of Darkness, that shit will go on for days and days if white people get a wiff of it. sssshhhh we wust be wary wary quit, when talking about stuff whites like……


 
 

haha…this blog is genious.

People in general seem to be too sensitive these days and get offended by anything ….toughen up ..white people


Camel Toes '87 on May 28, 2008 at 11:01 am

I’m truly offended by your inability to use a dictionary.


 

Really smart people never spell the word “genius” correctly. That kind of irony is pure genious, friend.


 
 

Is “genious” and “ingenious” like those words that sound like they should be opposites but they’re not – like “flammable” and “inflammable”?


noble- ignoble
regardless- irregardless

Jut kidding. I know irregardless isn’t a real word because I’m white, and I love grammar!


 
 
 
 

A subset of this post could be white people who get offended by seemingly banal matters, like waiting too long for a bus and threatening to write a strongly worded letter to the powers-that-be.


hahaha a strongly-worded letter. the white people did that in the Titanic movie, for God’s sake.


 
ultraviolet79 on May 28, 2008 at 7:23 pm

I think that might be stuff old people like.


 
Enjoying whiteness on May 28, 2008 at 1:46 pm

People and rugs are oriental…..


to you what the? try to post things with at least some underlined meaning. 2. i cant spell genious o.o but i dont do it on purpose


 
gosh, you are dumb on May 29, 2008 at 12:00 am

your mom is oriental
and terrible in bed


Why must you offend for no reason? Your mom jokes are old and no longer accepted. They are for people with nothing better and to tell you the truth they are in general not offensive to me because my mom is a whore and im not afraid to admit that. Shes having another child soon that ill never know. p.s. dont point out my lack of proper grammar i couldnt care less ill admit im lazy as well.


 
Camel Toes '87 on May 29, 2008 at 8:21 am

Oriental mom.
She is terrible in bed.
I’ve just offended.


 
 
 

Although, watching one get all ticked off about nothing can be very entertaining. I was in line at a supermarket and some short, old dude who looked like he weighed about 90 pounds got all pissed because the checker wouldn’t accept his double coupon from another store. So, this guy, who, appears to expect people to do as he says, starts cussing and getting all red faced and looking like he was about to start frothing at the mouth (I was poised with my trusty cell phone video cam to capture it if he did). I started to chuckle, and he looked back at me like some demon psycho and I just kind of shrugged my shoulders and he turned back to the checker. Of course, the manager was called; of course the Lunatic got his extra 50 cents off whatever it was he was trying to use the coupon on (the man bought like $300 worth of groceries). It was funny and terrifying at the same time. It also sucked a little too: while this freak was making all this drama, the rest of us had to stand there waiting with our stuff.


if it was walmart then their policy states they must match the lowest price from any other store if proof is shown (within reason i saw a coupon for 1 cent crayons behind the counter circled and said dont match this offer)


 
 

This could also come in the form of excuses not to tip restaurant waitstaff; ex. “I asked for no ice in my water! I’ll have your job for this!”


I’ve read all of the comments so far and I must say that this is the best one.

God bless comedy (Hope my use of the name God doesn’t offend anyone)


 
laugh all day on May 28, 2008 at 2:15 pm

You must know more jews than I do.


jews like ice, its more water for the money. Although, if those damn waiters did there damn job, in a shitty economy that another person who would be happy as hell to have that job and not fuck it up, and remembered the proper order, then they wouldnt have to be threatened.


 
 
 

Did this happen a few months ago, in Manhattan, on Broadway and 27th Street? Because that sounds like what I said while waiting (and waiting and waiting) for a bus home one evening. I had no idea that someone was taking dictation!

Well, the joke’s on you, because 1. I’m only half white and 2. That half is the wrong kind of white, not a White Person as defined by SWPL. That bus was going to Staten Island, and no White People (TM) live in Staten Island. We’ve got some pretty lousy public transportation. Hence my annoyance.


ps–i’m white and i live in staten island. so did ralph waldo emerson. and henry dadid thoreau, thomas adams…and even aaron burr….i’m pretty sure we’re all white


 

“White” isn’t a skin color. It’s a state of mind.


until you’re put in your place if you ain’t white.


 
Portnoy's complaint on May 28, 2008 at 9:25 pm

“White” isn’t a skin color. It’s a state of mind.

FALSE.

You are either entirely 100% of European, non-semitic descent, or you are incapable of having White offspring.

Sorry, but facts are facts.

It takes a White male, and a White female, and ONLY that combination to produce White kids.


Wrong my friend i know a girl who is black who had an entirely white child and a half white child. Also they may mean they have the mind of the steriotype of a white person.


 

Please tell that to my aunt. She’s had this problem at the airport with her son because HE IS SO WHITE, and she is his mother, but it doesn’t look that way from the surface…


 

emilio estevez and charlie sheen shonuff look white to me.


Portnoy's complaint on May 29, 2008 at 4:25 pm

They are 100% White, of Spaniard and Irish extraction.

If there are no “whites” because “we’re all the same human race”, then someone forgot to tell the Chosen ones to get with the program. Israelis too.

I don’t think Michelle Obama and those that love “quotas” are willing to listen to you guys that “we’re all the same” either.

LaRaza doens’t listen to what you say either, why should Whites?


You sure complain a lot. I agree with this to a degree. “white” indeed is the color of some people’s skin (albino) but this is due to an illness and to the rest of this comment i must disagree. Doing this isnt for them they may or may not change their minds in the matter but if you change at least one other persons mind its all worth while. We are put here to put aside the ignorance of the majority of humans who think color is everything. each race has their strong points and their weaknesses but if we come together our spawn may be rid of these.


 
 
 

So that means there are about 10 white people left? How many white people can truly claim only white ancestry? Considering the Queen of England is related by blood to Mohammed, I imagine few in the western world can.


 
gosh, you are dumb on May 28, 2008 at 11:59 pm

thank god
I was worried that my plot to populate the world with my mixed race children wasn’t going to work because they kept coming out so pale…
I think I’ll infiltrate the FLDS to get some real miscegenation going on
thank god for white folks


O.o say what? im sorry but this decision isnt up to you my simple minded friend ^.^


 
 
 

Ummm, well, I hate to break it to you, but, yeah, it really is a skin color. If you don’t to think so, send a black man who thinks he’s white to a clan rally. I think he’ll come back to reality real quick. This doesn’t mean there aren’t a lot of black people of privilege who think they are as good as. But, when the right situation comes around, let them see how white they really are, and how closely their white skinned friends hold them in times of trouble–or opportunity. Do you think they’d be offended?


The problem with this of course being that Klan members are almost exclusively lower-income, non-college eduated, blue-collar whites, so what cause would a black man of privilege have for going there? If he’s as snobby as the average white person of privilege, he wouldn’t be seen within 20 feet of a bunch of cousin-screwin,’ sweet potata pie-cookin’ po’ white folks in the Deep South.


 
Blue-Eyed Columbus on May 29, 2008 at 5:30 am

Ummm, well, I hate to break it to you, but, yeah, it really is a skin color. If you don’t to think so, send a black man who thinks he’s white to a clan rally.

Klan gatherings seem to be in short supply these days. Put the dark chocolate in the park across from the Beverly Hills Motel. They seem to disappear much faster. :)


Ha very funny but try deep in the heart of georgia.


 
 

Or just go with your white “friends” to a restaurant, and see how quickly they choose seats NOT next to you!


 
RallyMonkey on May 28, 2008 at 2:48 pm

Ummmm, that’s because the folks at the klan rally aren’t White People. Get with it.


Dave Chappelle really is genius, funny how you quoted a skit of his! tobad he went all crazy and couldnt take the pressure, where is he now? thats what i thought, he just wasnt white enough, almost, but not quite.


 
 
 
 

PS: If that was me you quoted, I’m not offended (I just know that someone was ready to pounce on that one. Too bad, I just beat you to it!), I’m impressed. I’ve never been mocked by complete strangers on the Internet before. Now I know how Britney Spears feels.


 
 
christopher on May 28, 2008 at 9:03 am

this is termed: white entitlement.
white people feel that they are entitled to
everything coming pleasantly and easy to them.


I am a white man, and I am offened at this statement. We do not have a sense of entitlement as you say. That is a lie from hell itself! However, I have noticed that black people and other minorities seem to think this is true while ignoring their own sense of it. They most often speak about being a biggot and apply the image of a biggot to white men, and all the while they them selves hate whites unjustly. If anyone wants to stop predjudice, the first place you need to start is with yourself.


 

no thats just humans. We had a competition in tennis. The person who can serve the ball down the “T” and his the balls wins a raquet (of which the coach has 3). First to win was white, then black, then a noobie asian who got lucky. A black man got really angry and said black people never win these things. I (who am white) didnt get one either. In the end a firl ( who was in a seperate competition) gave him her raquet and gave me a case for mine because she felt sorry for us. lol (the case was for whoever aimed for the corner and hit those balls)


 

Yes, but I feel this way too, and I am not white. Perhaps we should call it, “The entitlement of the bored.”


 

But getting involved in sooooooo important to a white person! Civic virtue is its own reward!


 
laugh all day on May 28, 2008 at 2:13 pm

true, true. It’s a sham that goes way back. But what about the ones who think all will come their way if Obama gets elected. Any dumbass knows what the eventual outcome will, be.


Truth is Obama cannot help either race or he will be impeached as soon as he does. The black person will realize Obama isnt the god he belived he would be or the white person will pull out the “race card”


 

I know, everyone is thinking Obama is the messiah or somthing, are you kidding me? do you really think he is going to be able to solve this? I cant wait until 2013 when everyone realizes he couldnt do what he promised.

Remember, the anti-christ is a false messiah, o there i go referencing things again……silly white me


Camel Toes '87 on May 28, 2008 at 8:46 pm

That would be scary if not for the fact that you cannot prove there *is* an anti-christ.


As a friend pointed out to me once, Christianity is simply a theory. It can neither be proved nor disproved. The same is true for the theory that there are invisible flying pigs.


 
Portnoy's complaint on May 28, 2008 at 9:22 pm

Obama voters are mostly illiterate when it comes to the economy and discussion of fiscal budgets.

Obama cannot afford all the crap his non-White freeloaders think they will be getting.


 
 
 
 
Camel Toes '87 on May 28, 2008 at 11:00 am

I’m offended by those little bitches on “My Super Sweet Sixteen” on MTV, speaking of “white entitlement”. I love how children are entitled to Mommy’s and Daddy’s money through birthright. Even worse is the parent who allows the sixteen year-old to have a Jaguar AND a $100,000 party. My son is twenty and his mode of transportation is public because I’ll be DAMNED if I’m gonna buy him a car (and I can afford it!) Parents like the ones mentioned above are setting their children up for a drug addiction because the real world will be nothing like the world for which their parents have prepared them.


except the parents will continue to buy the security
well into their adulthood. which you couldn’t afford.
and it sounds like you have an issue with your son
anyway ms. camel toe. cuz a parenty helping a kid
with a first car is quite innocuous….


Generally buying or helping your child with his/her first car is a family tradition.


 
 
marvin berry on May 28, 2008 at 4:00 pm

dude, there is a big difference between buying your kid a car and spoiling them. im pretty sure a honda wouldn’t lead to drug addiction, give the kid a break. this is america, a guy has gotta have his wheels.


If the kid is 20 and can’t scrape up enough to buy a used Honda, he/she was way bigger problems.


 

Seriously… how is that kid going to get laid? Bus passes rarely = sex.


get laid with other loser-cruiser riders.


 
 
 

Sweet Sixteen Excesses: Offensive.
$100K vehicles for dangerous teen drivers: Offensive.
Parenting without child’s accountability: Offensive.
I’m with you CT’87 on all the above, but regardless of the excesses of parenting, the children are entitled to their parents’ money because the parents decide to give it to them. Who else should be entitled to the money? The neighbors, the state?


Camel Toes '87 on May 28, 2008 at 11:58 am

And I do know it’s every parent’s prerogative to do as s/he wishes with her/his money. HOWEVER when one is putting the general public in danger by letting loose a barely-trained child behind the wheel of a 12 cylinder car, that’s irresponsible, validating my previous statement.

Hell no, the state shouldn’t get it. They get enough and don’t use it for what it was intended half the time, anyway.


Those parents need to be shot, those children are too ugly to be so self centered and vain, im self centered and vain, but im actually very good looking and have a great body. Half of those little slutty girls on that show are over weight, i have an idea, instead of giving your daughter a party with a candy bar, and a 4 foot tall cake, you take them to get a colonic and set them on a strict diet of carrots, because a party comes and goes, but being thin usually stays with a good diet.


Being against sluttyness is ok. im ok with that. Hell i go to the gym 4 times a week but i find it mean to be against fat people. some cant help, it such as inherited diabeties. People who eat half a ton and expect to be skinny im against, and people who try to lose weight by starving themselves im against. my problem lies in the fact that the more fat you become the likelyhood of dieing to heart attack is higher. In other words i dont want them to die, which will happen if they starve themselves.


 

You must be talking about NJ jewish brats, and their parents, right?


im actually talking about those fat slutty girls in kentucky and atlanta, they are terrible


 
Camel Toes '87 on May 29, 2008 at 8:15 am

Or Italian. You see that a lot in Jersey.


 
 
 

Complete agreement here!


i would think after your kid got a college degree he could get a job and not have to get money from you. didn’;t you read rich dad/poor dad? that book should be added to this list.


 
 
 
Camel Toes '87 on May 28, 2008 at 11:52 am

No, the parents are entitled to their money. Wanna give it to your kid? Twenty-one seems like a reasonable age. And only after a college degree.


 
 
 

You’re sooo right, the white people on the channel 12 news in Portland being interviewed after the parking lot outside their Yoga class was burglarized said it all “We’re relaxing in here and we were robbed! This shouldn’t happen!” or “This shouldn’t happen here, we are trying to help people in the Easter Seals business next door! How could someone do this here?!?!” What WHITE LIBERAL ELITIST ARROGANCE.

And this was what Portland’s Fox 12 news considered so important that they took up the first 9 minutes of their broadcast with.


uhh…..burglarized?

..burgled?


yes they were homeless so they stole some burgers. (lol jk im sorry i just figured it would be nice to throw in a joke)


 

I like the term, “burgled.” Reminds me of the turd-burglers of my youth.


 
Portnoy's complaint on May 28, 2008 at 9:18 pm

It shouldn’t happen.

In White societies it doesn’t happen.

You are basically saying Whites should accept “diversity” and the cess-pool Third World values and culture that inevitably come with it.

No way.

Everyone knows that the thief was a non-White. Why liberals prefer to live in non-White, regressive and backwards culture is beyond me.

Some of these liberals actually think Third World -BS is “culture”. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!


Wrong Portnay (or whatever your name is) it turns out that the thieves are white.

My point is that they are completely ignorant to the evils in the world and act as if (this part you did get right) they live in a bubble and shouldn’t have to deal with evils in the world.

My comment had nothing to do with race other than the implication the white folk made during the report, insinuating that it wasn’t a white person.

Now they know it was, with a foot in their mouth they keep on acting like they are “above it all” and by they I don’t mean white people, I mean white liberal elitists.

Don’t even get me started on the myth that suburban lifestyle promotes minority crime (another white liberal elitist myth)


Portnoy's complaint on May 29, 2008 at 5:18 pm

alright. I still have an answer for you!!

If the Portland perps were white, and I’m taking you on your word, then it’s the fault of the Mexican scum meth dealers that are pushing that shit on our people.

Bush won’t even enforce out borders and how much Mexican meth hits our population?

Bush sucks, he loves mexiscum because the only ones he’s ever met were docile 58-year old women who make his bed. :(


Thats not the fault of the mexicans. i must admit i dislike illegal immagrants, but its the white person’s fault for being so mentally weak that they would accept such. I also believe that since if they see a white person run into mexico they kill us that if they try to jump our border stick a cap in their border-jumping ass


 

You get all bent out of shape about Mexicans supposedly pushing meth on poor, innocent white people who CLEARLY don’t know any better, but I bet you have no problem with the actions of the British during the Opium Wars.


are you even either british or chinese? did you fight in that war? are you high on opium right now you good for nothing lib i am sooooo offended


 
 
PazPraSempre on June 7, 2008 at 9:17 am

The vast majority of Mexicans who come here aren’t here to sell drugs. And the drug trade is simply because of supply and demand. No one pushes drugs on anyone. Drugs are a huge business because of the rich spoiled white kids who love them.


 
houzekepin (knock) on June 2, 2008 at 1:25 pm

Mexicans only deal and make meth (they don’t consume) for the white truck drivers and prostitutes in your trailer park. Don’t hate, participate. You know a lot about meth. You should give in and take some more one less of you more of my kind. Is it scarry for you to know that we are 39 million and growing? Id be shitting my pants if I were you. We are so not going anywhere. quick look behind you we might just be there. BOOO!


I agree that not all mexicans are in the drug trade but to tell you the truth, i wish that you and whoever else was with you when you jumped the border would’ve been shot. no good criminals.


 
 
 
 

Right, ’cause there are no white people in prison. Everyone knows that white people don’t lie, cheat, steal, rape, pillage, or murder! Only liberal rags run stories about white crime! I get all my news from the local 10 o’clock broadcast, where they teach you to fear non-whites! Oh, and watch out if Dave Matthews or Charlize Theron show up at your house, they’re African-Americans after all!


pay more attention. white people are actually the majority of inmatesas far as racial groups. but its not publisized unless they do something big like bomb something. watch cops and youll see mostly white criminals. we are so many we make up more than half of population. You dont see as many of us on the news because if every crime we commited was up there it would flood the news.


 

Actually Charlize Theron shot her dad dead in self defense when she was 15. Um…I thought I would mention that just for the record. Totally unimportant. I know.


Actaully, her mom killed her father in self-defense


 
 
Portnoy's complaint on May 29, 2008 at 5:11 pm

Whites are far less prone to crime than the non-white races, with the exception of Asians who commit less crimes than Whites.

See? I’m fair and always honest.

Those are the facts. Even in a state like Minnesota (with no history of slavery or oppressing blacks) has a huge disproportionate black prison population.

WV has “poverty” but little crime.

Michael Vick wasn’t poor, and he didnt ‘lack oppotunities, but like so many other blacks, he STILL ends up in prison.

The current NBA MVP is a black-on-white rapist (Kobe Bryant), and he’s not lacking in opportunity either, so save us all the “excuses”.


well doesnt mean we dont commit crimes. it means we dont get caught as much XD


 

Can you show me where you found a statistic that says Black people commit more crime? The fact that Black people are overrepresented in prison populations doesn’t mean they commit more crime. It means they are disproportionately punished for crime. You’re making a claim that your ‘statistics’ don’t support.

I know this might seem shocking, but Whites are arrested at higher rates than any other race!!! If I use your logic, that makes them more criminal than any other race. In Minnesota, Blacks in Minneapolis were stopped by police officers 225% more times than what they should have been relative to their population EVEN WHEN THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITY AS A PRECURSOR FOR THE STOP!!!

As far as Michael Vick is concerned, what he did was wrong. He should be punished if he did it. But there are many cases with White athletes where they commit crimes but are not punished. Brett Favre was addicted to prescription drugs and would play games high, go to press conferences high and drunk. Then all he had to say was I’m addicted to drugs after he almost died from a seizure and everyone feels bad for him.. the fallen hero. He was a FELON by definition in US Law!!! But did he serve any prison time? Was he suspended by the NFL? No. You’ve got possession. If he had any ziploc bags, you’ve got intent to sell. In some states, that means a mandatory 5 or 10 years in prison! Please explain why he wasn’t punished.

Btw, I’m not saying I support Vick or that people shouldn’t feel bad for Favre. I’m just asking how people can explain the different characterization of these crimes in the media.


thats not the law. zip lock bags wtf. it was perscription via legal he wasnt punished because the police werent breaking the law to get him. (via accusing his of intent to sell when he was obviously using them himself lol) but again more whites are in prison because there are more of us.


 
 
Calmudphunkie on May 30, 2008 at 4:02 pm

Portnoy, for years, we in science have thought human beings to be superior in intelligence, however, everyday, I’m forced to realize, this is grossly untrue. You’re pretty dense and if it wasn’t so pathetic, it’ll almost be funny.


i agree hes dense, but by insulting him in such a way your lowering yourself to his way. try to be a little more formal lol.


 
 
 
 

Portnoy, spend a few years in the corporate world and then try to tell us that white people don’t steal. I’m sorry, I know I just offended you, but it will all make sense to you when you become an adult.


True my uncle is the general manager of a night club and he has fired many for stealing. Stealing is a human weakness to get something easily. Its an impulse you must resist.


 

+ 1,000 Udouchebag


 
Camel Toes '87 on May 29, 2008 at 8:14 am

He was referring to the person in question.

You need to read before you open your know-it-all mouth.


 
 
tyler durden on May 28, 2008 at 11:08 pm

preach on…my white brother


like you all about to speak in tongues n
shit…


don’t speak, really, ur too ignorant of the facts. re re i mean ray ray. and if u ever saw that for real, maybe you’d be scared straight into realizing maybe you don’t know it all.


 
 

lord, you wish.
preach on…when a white person ever
said preach on…ninjas don’t even say
that anymore, proving yet again you’re
80 light years behind.


this is a common saying among blacks. come down to memphis and see for yourself.


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Whites enjoy hurting other whites through affirmative action, taxation that supports the insane welfare programs and gun control, to leave white defenseless against black criminals.

I am enjoying watching these PC whites get crushed by the real estate collapse. “Flyover country” won’t be hurt very badly, but the liberals on the coasts are ruined.

(typo corrected)


Whites also enjoy sending white jobs overseas and leaving their fellow whites believing that blacks, welfare, etc., is what’s responsible for white problems.


 

Great point. I hate it when white people call stuff like that “class” issues. Its so obvious that its a race issue.


 
HellO'Kitty on May 28, 2008 at 5:04 pm

Well said. The White CEO’s make millions by paying substandard wages to Third Worlders while our economy at here at home spirals further into recession.


Blue-Eyed Columbus on May 29, 2008 at 6:00 am

White CEO’s make millions by paying substandard wages to Third Worlders

Substandard wages for non-white races. Makes sense to me. :)


Columbus! Thanks for the guns, man!


 
Miss South Carolina on May 29, 2008 at 10:51 am

You’re like, totally insecure.


 
 

Tell me, why is it considered substandard for Third Worlders to earn “substandard” wages? Why are you holding them to the US/EU standard of wages? These people are WILLING to work for these wages, and with these wages allow them to support their families. Leave it to white people to think that they know what is best for poor people.


Correction: they can barely scrape by with these wages. They don’t make enough money to support a family. They also don’t make enough to put money back into the local economy and the corporations certainly don’t have any interest in their economy. They seek to increase their bottom line. After the wages get too high, they pack up and leave to destroy another country. Another problem with these corporations is that they seek countries that do not have as many regulations as far as waste and pollution, so not only have they destroyed the economy when they leave, they’ve destroyed the ecosystem. Capitalism sure is great, isn’t it?


would you rather be Communist? would you rather have the government saying that parents grieving over the loss of their only kid are just creating disturbances? would you rather be rewarded based on what the gov thinks you deserve, not what you can earn?

at least with Capitalism we know what s***’s going on. Don’t knock it til you’ve lived in Burma, Cuba, etc.

(Which I haven’t. just saying).


 
 
Portnoy's complaint on May 28, 2008 at 9:14 pm

HelloKitty: they outsource jobs to non-Whites for low wages, and they insource jobs to illegal non-Whites for low wages.

Go Figure.

The liberals that call the GOP “racist” are clueless at how anti-White the GOP really is. The GOP won’ even secure the US border.

Why do liberals hate GWB??????? He does more for them than he does conservatives.


idk what gop is but for the rest i agree. nice to see you finally came to the same conclusion as i did.


 

I see you have taken up drinking again.


Calmudphunkie on May 30, 2008 at 3:58 pm

yeah, that, and also sticking his head up his rectum again. Stop it, it’s a foul way to go through life.
Oh yeah, loser.


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
mac daniels on May 28, 2008 at 8:08 am

This post is offensive.


I’m happy Dunkin’ Donuts pulled the TV commercial with Rachael Ray and her Yasser Arafat scarf. She looks like a terrorist.


anyone who would connect rachel ray with yasser arafat and religious extremism because of wearing a paisley scarf is a moron.


 

i think she looked FABULOUS and shouldda
been workin dat shit on da runway…
replete wid an AK-47…church bitches.


 

I don’t know what you’re talking about… that scarf is worn by most middle eastern men, not just Yasser Arafat. It’s a piece of clothing. It’s not like she was wearing the Palestenian flag.

Stereotypes like these are just a step back to understanding diversity.


well that would be true if we ignore the fact that the keffiyeh is often worn by Non-Arabs as a sign of support for Palestine. Which basically amounts to gang colors whether you realize it or not. Now who needs a lesson in diversity?


houzekepin (knock) on June 2, 2008 at 1:10 pm

thats another thing I don’t understand about white people who the F**k notices a scarf on a DD commercial and like writes into corporate and makes a big stink. I know who! housewives from Naperville while waiting for little “Austin” to come out of gymboree. WTF, it is just a scarf. It is not gang colors as suggested earlier or terroristic, Dr. Evil plots intent on taking over the world via munchkin ads.

GET A GRIP

love, your housekeeper/nannie/gardner/ (insert stereotypical mexican job)

this is what we really think but we don’t say it to your faces at least not yet. wait a few years when we are the majority pop. then we’ll talk


Will they say it in English?


oh shit roflmao


 
 
 
 
 

So when you smell your farts, do you go straight into your hand or do you go into a wine glass?


 
 
 
 

Whites enjoy hurting other white through affirmative action, taxation that supports the insane welfare programs and gun control, to leave white defenseless against black criminals.

I am enjoying watching these PC whites get crushed by the real estate collapse. “Flyover country” won’t be hurt very badly, but the liberals on the coasts are ruined.


ummm, the liberals on the coasts aren’t the ones crying over the mortgage mess buddy


apparently you have never heard of “california”……fyi, it’s the big state on the west coast that is as liberal as it gets and has more foreclosures per capita this side of flint MI……. and they are all bitching about it.


Calmudphunkie on May 30, 2008 at 3:55 pm

You’ve obviously never looked at a map of California. it’s this insanely large state, with lots of regions. There’s a place called Stockton- it is full of conservatives and middle class people who moved there due to this thing called gentrification- they all lost their home.
It’s also meth capital of the world too.


houzekepin (knock) on June 2, 2008 at 12:56 pm

I have a lot of my border jumping cusins that live in Stockton. I have news for all of you. Those republican middle class people who moved out of LA because of gentrefication have company. (this isn’t a joke I really do have like 15 border jumping cusins in Stockton) sorry.


 
 

Yeah, and I’m going to have to pay to bail them out of their financial mess because I’m not a fucking moron. Well, I wasn’t a moron when I acted responsibly, but maybe I am one now for not anticipating the bailout.


 
 
 

Not this liberal, I snatch up those foreclosed homes for pennies on the dollar and sell them for just a little more. I’m making cash, not a lot, but enough to keep the power on and the jacuzzi hot and bubbly! Is it wrong to make a living off the desperate? Maybe, but, who cares? They’re stupid for getting themselves into ARM’s and the people who end up buying these places are smart for watching for a great price on a house they really like at a time when houses are as cheap as ever and interest rates are super low. Hah! Take offense to that. Maybe I’m not a liberal after all. Maybe, oh my God, I’m a Libertarian! Wow, I’m glad I figured that one out. For a second, visions of voting for a democrat danced around in my head. Whew!


at least you live your truth, shit.
this type is much better than the stealth
libs anyday.


 

Libertarians are the only moral people.

Don’t initiate force or fraud and mind your own business.


 

o please, libertarians are awful, they only accept social issues because they have a gay son and a slutty ass daughter who has had 4 abortions……..otherwise they are just another terrible republican……


de Waco Kid on May 29, 2008 at 10:23 am

Now, wait a minute. I’ve had sex with the aborted child of my slutty, lesbian daughter–the child who was also mine. Does this make me a Libertarian? I thought it made me a psycho. I’m glad I got that cleared up. I was ready to turn myself in.


 

you have a small penis


 
Portnoy's complaint on May 28, 2008 at 9:11 pm

Ron Paul has delivered 4,000 infants into this world as an M.D. He served the USA for 5 years in the military during Vietnam as a flight surgeon. He’s been married for almost 50 years

He’s the only honest American pol there is.

PS Ron Paul, as an ob/gyn, views abortion for what it really is.

He is the ONLY true Republican left, and true conservatives, that seek to “conserve” that which is good, are not always in conflict with democrats.


if this is true i must agree with you. again T.T im not liking this


 

Ron Paul also said in a speech in 1995 (maybe 1996 – I can’t recall right now) that “I think we can safely assume that 95% of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal.” You’re right. He is a real conservative.


 
Questioning Portnoy's Complaint on June 1, 2008 at 9:50 am

When you say “views abortion for what it really is”, do you mean “murder” or “a medical procedure”?

My grandmother is as conservative as they come, but she worked as a nurse in pre-Roe v Wade days and saw the botched abortions, and she only votes for pro-choice candidates.


im sorry but abortion is full out murder as much as shooting someone. it is also a medical procedure, but not one i believe should exist. THOSE BABIES COULD HAVE FREAKING BEEN A PRESIDENT IT MAY HAVE BEEN HARD BUT ITS POSSIBLE. YOU DONT WANT YOUR BABY, FIND SOMEONE WHO DOES. GOING THROUGH THE PAIN OF NEVER KNOWING YOUR PARENTS ISNT WORSE THAN DEATH. NOT WANTING YOUR CHILD IS WRONG IN THE FIRST PLACE UNLESS YOUVE BEEN RAPED. ILL UNDERSTAND IF YOU GIVE AWAY YOUR CHILD AT THAT POINT, BUT ABORTION=MURDER. DO YOU HAVE NO GOD?


 
 

Portnoy, just about everything you say I disagree with and now I read this and am perfect agreement with it. I’m going up the frig to see if my OJ was spiked.


 

Delivering infants, serving in the military, and being married for a long time are not unique qualifications for political honesty or insights into human morality.

For the record, there are no true Republicans left, if any ever actually existed. Don’t get too excited, there aren’t any true Democrats either.


these are simply labels. these are steriotypes. no one directly supports everything from the other side.


 
Portnoy's complaint on May 29, 2008 at 5:23 pm

Delivering infants, serving in the military, and being married for a long time are not unique qualifications for political honesty or insights into human morality.

Oh really? Do you have a better list? That’s an impressive resume compared to most Americans.

He knows more about health care than Obama and Hillary combined and squared.


Actually my point was that, while none of those are bad things, they aren’t really unique in any way. Lots of OB/GYNs deliver babies, but they don’t all share his moral convictions. Lots of people have served in the military, but that doesn’t mean they’d make good statesmen. Lots of people have been married for many years, but they aren’t all nice people. The combination of having those things in one person isn’t magical.

You like Ron Paul, so you look for reasons to validate your opinion. I don’t think they serve for anything but mental masturbation with other Ron Paul supporters.


sorry but you didnt support your theory in any way. these things are good, there is the possibility, but the chance is slim to none.


 

Meh who are you? Thanks for being critically vigilant. Best wishes and thanks for the little back up there..


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
laugh all day on May 28, 2008 at 2:09 pm

try forclosure auctions.


 

Preach on, brother. Prices go up, prices go down, as do interest rates. If someone can’t understand that, they should get used to disappointment.

It’s strange. I’ve more than once been accused of being a social Darwinist, which I assume is a bad thing judging by their tone, by the kind of people who have Darwin fish on their cars.

Trying to follow the mental gymnastics involved only results in a migraine.


Philosopher on May 29, 2008 at 10:44 am

The term “Social Darwinist” actually involves a category mistake… Darwinism holds that over generations genetic mutations will lead to the survival of certain animals over others–which just is the evolutionist picture (drastically simplified of course). To make “Darwinism” work for “society” would involve the adaptation of an entire society over the course of many generations. Suggesting that stupid people should be allowed to die off if not social Darwinism, it’s just good sense. When you have a plurality of idiots making the decisions for everyone, there is a problem… but that is not my point here.
My point is that the term “social Darwinist” connotes a wide-scale confusion about both how evolution works and what exactly it means to be an elitist.
You may be an elitist, and that’s fine… lots of people are. But next time you are called a “social darwinist” please set the record straight… the user of this term is uttering syntactic structures that mimic meaningful discourse, but failing to actually say anything meaningful at all.
whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must pass over in silence.


the dumb may have some genial flaws but also in those genes may hold the keys to the making of a genious (sorry cant spell it T.T) if they die they didnt deserve to live, but dont help the process it will all come to an end it just takes time. Darwin said himself that in order for this to occur that it would take more time or the cells would break down due to the rapid mutation. But then again it is a theory, and can neither be proven, nor disproven. for all we know our cells may have had more of a tolerance for mutation and we may breed those same cells in due time.


 

dude no one read this because it was all like Blahdy blah blah. No one wants to read some ass pontificating about some shit no one cares about. Your second to last sentence, when you say “failing to actually say anything meainingful at all”. Thats what happened here, you failed to say anything meaningful. Que Darwinism ni que la chingada. simplified: if your dumb you die. The end.


Philosopher sympathizer on June 3, 2008 at 11:49 pm

Shut your trap, pleb.


you just contradicted your name.


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Camel Toes '87 on May 28, 2008 at 11:06 am

Well, I’m not one of those “pc whites” and the housing slump is affecting me in a big way.

I’m almost offended by your post.


I find camel toes offensive.


They beat panty lines any day.


Camel Toes '87 on May 29, 2008 at 9:55 am

Yeah, and panty lines don’t cause yeast infections and chafing.


You say that as if it’s a bad thing.


true to your name. and wtf L


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Its hard for a white person to not get offended because they are always right.


sean kennedy on June 12, 2008 at 8:14 pm

I hadn’t thought about it before. Yes, you are right, white people are always right. You must be white. Me too. We should get together.


I’m white. There are 49 states. I was wrong. By the tone of what he/she said, he/she is not white, via you are wrong. ftw


 
 

That’s quite funny. How many white people would read non white people’s blogs?


 
 

My initial reaction was that white people are the hardest to offend. Then I read this… I started cracking up when I realized that the point was that they get offended on behalf of others.

That’s what makes this site so brilliant.

http://death-sentences.blogger.com


 

Well, I gotta say that was an interesting point, but I totally disagree. In fact, the message is kind of problematic because it reinforces xenophobic ideals. I just used a big word, and I’m a minority so does that mean I’m trying to act white? Yes I do agree that white people are born with certain privileges. White people are the dominant race in this world, majority of CEO’s are white, at times they walk into a store without the fear of being followed, but there are certain disadvantages as well. White people are scapegoats for tyranny that they have caused against minorities or the underserved, white people are stereotypically seen as racist, ignorant, and silver spooned. For one I believe that is problematic, just as all stereotypes and prejudice beliefs are problematic because it creates a distortion of reality. Not all white people are rich, not all white people are smart when It boils down they all have their own individual characteristic. I will admit that they are endowed with certain privileges, just as we all are to some extent. I will admit that majority of white people are in the upper class category, which grants them better access to education and resources and at time they are oblivious to certain things. But I will end this by saying that white people will still get offended just as if anyone who used any racial epithets to attack blacks, yellows, or browns. In the end it doesn’t matter if white people has a higher tolerance to bigotry because universally we should not attack and create assumption on each other just because we are members of a distinct racial or ethnic group.


the minority of minorities are white because we are the minority of humans on this crazy sphere we call earth ^.^


 

WOW, you just changed the world bro. This broken bird can now fly again.


thanks for the sarcasm we really needed more of that. -.-


 
 
Pascal's A Solid Wager on May 30, 2008 at 2:27 pm

When you were writing up this respectably thoughtful but depressingly melodramatic rebuttal to an innocuous humor blog, did you stop and guess how many people would make it all the way through your militant ramblings? I did, about halfway through, and that guesstimation was zero, including me.


sorry but you guessed wrong i did and so did most of my friends. you lose. good day sir.


 
 

this guy is a fucktard if he’s black. i think he’s white.


It’s extremely peculiar that most of you assume that I’m black, well in fact it doesn’t matter what race I am. Ok there are majority of whites in the working class, but then you also have whites controlling most of the wealth, especially 1 percent of the world’s wealth. So I guess it’s relative. Also, I Portnoy, I will agree that I am racist, in fact all of us are racist, but refuse to admit it. We are all socialized in this hegemonic culture to be sexist, homophobic, classist, misogynistic, so thanks for calling me out and your take on professionalism racism is not plausible but interesting. My intent is to enlighten the populace to see a different picture, and I don’t like to retype my shit. Feel free to reread the post, so that we can have a constructive debate. So thanks for being complacent.


again the majority of most majorities are white because most of humans are “white” but what does color have to do with it? only a few are smart enough to realize color is generally not a factor and these few tend to act racist so they are not thought arrogant.


 

Actually you’re wrong as hell. It’s Jews that own the majority of the world’s wealth through their central banking cartels. You obviously look at them and think that they’re white because they have light skin. Look at the last names before you start spewing that garbage. All of the banks are run by Jews, the major media outlets are run by Jews. Check out realjewnews.com and get educated.


the jews simply are generally better at managing money.


 

John, you sound like an ignorant cracker Ku Klux Klan Grand Wizard. Your generalization is simply not true. Take that pointy white hat off your head and go to school.


ur the idiot here amazed, watch zeitgeist. its TRUE that jews run everything.


 

amazed, good post. john, so dissapointed. loved ur other posts esp. the irony one. anywho, really do some research. nobel peace prizes are overwhelmingly given to the Jewish. if they have money, so what. are you jealous? be content with what you have. they are also God’s chosen people. He says to him who blesses you, i will bless, to him who curses you, i will curse. you means the people of israel btw. hit ch’ur knees john!


 
 
 

Actually, only white people assumed you were black.


 

Jay Koo. Your funny. Please do a real easy search of worlds richest people. Yes there are white folks on the list. In fact, top 2 outa 3 are from the good ‘ol White USA. Soon enough the so called White people will be a minority in this country. Already are in the world. So before you start tryin to enlighten, the populace with your views that are not researched, it’s frighten. Please just make sure your points of facts really are. Then you really wouldn’t have to retype your shit.
For the record, mom was Mexican, dad German. Look white, drink like a spic.


 

P.S yeah I am fixated with these negative notions because of my socialization in the U.S or the world, but I am taking the necessary effort to challenge them. To see the world beyond the viewpoint of a narcissistic, hedonistic, pessimistic individuals.


try thinking before you type, and use smaller words because you just bored most of the people reading this blog to the point of sleeping. and when you use big words try making sure you know what they mean before using them to make you seem more intelligent


 

Well good for you. However, I do not agree that everyone is racist. There is a Facebook group with 24,000 members (yes, I’m one of them) called “I support interracial relationships.” A study found that 1 in 4 people under the age of 25 has dated or is dating someone outside of their race. So the older generation is a lot more racist than the younger generation.


i have dated a few blacks, and again i do not look at a person and see color i see them for personality. im 15 ftw


 

just because you aren’t attracted to a certain race doesn’t make you a racist. are all non-bisexuals sexist? Equally, interacial couples should not be mistreated.


that’s not the same thing at all. Whites in America are very isolated and very few Whites have had any close Black friends. In a study done by Eduardo Bonilla-Silva, most of the White interviewees said that they would not support a family member marrying a Black person (Bonilla-Silva, 2000). This is because Blacks and Whites are the most socially distant groups in America. White isolation as Bonilla-Silva puts it, fosters the creation of positive self-views (“We are nice, normal people”) and negative other views (“they are lazy”). Also, because most Whites live in a mostly/completely White environment, they are attracted to mostly/only Whites. This is not really even because of personal choice, rather a result of their self-segregation and isolation. I do agree that interracial couples should not be mistreated.

Jay Koo, I like some of your points but it is not true that everyone is racist. Everything in this country (i.e. the Constitution, the law, the criminal justice system, etc) was created by Whites and thus served the interests of Whites. Because Whites are the only group that benefits from these systems and institutions, they are the only group that can be racist as they can withhold and defend this hoarding of resources in the name of American liberalism (i.e. Whites have the wealth because they earned it). There are other defenses as well like [the myth of] equal opportunity, cultural racism (i.e. Blacks are lazy or they just don’t put as much effort into college prep, etc). It is possible for people of color to have racial prejudices, but this type of racial prejudice occurs on an individual level as there is no systemic racial oppression against Whites.

Jess, where did you get that information? That number doesn’t sound right to me because only 5% of marriages are interracial (Black and White are the least common of those). One would think that number would be higher if 25% of relationships were interracial.

“It’s laughable that Whites are racist. Professional racists and academic race-studies professors are the real racists, and they are non-whites pushing anti-White bigotry under the disguise of scholarly study.”

Actually, many of the sociology scholars that study race and ethnicity are WHITE.

If you want to talk about anti-White, maybe you should know a little more about Whiteness. Whiteness is a social construction. To say that scholars are anti-white, I guess, is true. Whiteness is something that exists only to justify and maintain privilege. Our founding father’s did NOT understand whiteness as we understand it today. White skin historically meant free whereas Black skin meant slave. White skin was transformed into intangible property by White elites, particularly in the antebellum south, so as to stop a mixed race class movement. They promoted racial propaganda so as to stop working-class Whites and working-class Blacks from working together for material gain. Ordinary Whites were then able to cling to Whiteness and have made material gains but not nearly what they would have made if they had worked with Blacks to change their class status. White elites ceded some control but still controlled most of the wealth and still do because they were able to distract Whites from the real issue which was elite control of wealth to this social construction called race. Back to the WW2 reference, the GI bill was what solidified Whiteness as ‘real.’ Whites before were differentiated by ethnicity and because of the GI bill and the systemic denial of its benefits to veterans of color, suburbs were created and that’s when ethnic differences between Whites really started to slip away.

Many ethnic Whites today would not have been classified as White 200 years ago (i.e. Poles, Slavs, Irish, etc). There is no such thing as White culture as every ethnicity of White had a different experience when they came to America. A shared group name entails a shared group experience which is not the case for Whites.


i read your very informative and mostly factual…article, dissertation, whatever. anyway, i’m white and i’ll say it- i got lots of black friends! they talk slang around me and forget i’m white and then laugh at me when i say what? it’s cool. i really think all people have a degree of racism in them. we talk about it and love one another despite our differences. if you cut me, i bleed red. if you cut my black bf, she’ll bleed red, too. people are afraid of what makes others different than them. learn from each other! and your thing about white culture, did you come from africa? then why do you say african american? i don’t say german/irish american. we are all just americans. no need to make distinctions. you need to, in the words of charles johnson, a black author, get new and better stories, new concepts and new vocabularies not rooted in the past but in the present. that present is now. remove victim, incarceration crisis and many other derogatory terms portraying blacks as problems instead of solutions from your minds. you have to be the change you want to see in the world -mahatma ghandi. for sure, the pre-21st century narrative is over. the only thing holding the black people back now is the opposing factions and sub-factions of blacks. obama hasn’t even moved in yet, and they (black nationalists, black usa haters to the race neutrals and millennial generation) are already fighting about what his priorities should be, the black agenda or universal hc, economy and war. another question, why is it that almost all votes cast from blacks went to obama? about 55-65 percent of all white votes cast went to mccain. who’s racist? i think we should all pray for obama and one another. i have to tell you this. black and white churches all over the south are teaching 1Chronicles 7:14. i hear about it from my black friends, i see it in magazines i read, on class posts in the online college i attend. everywhere. maybe we should heed its advice. can i at least get an amen on that?


Terri:
Fuck you. What this country needs is less tolerance of airheads like you.


 
 

1. i have many “black friends, most of which i consider good friends 2. i have dated black people and see nothing against it physical appearance is nothing compared to personality (i.e. dont date serial killers) 3. racism does exist, but is not true in everyone. 4. i am close to a.d.d and your post was flawed and boring 5. some see inner-racial dating as “experimentation” 6. blacks generally blame their lazyness on racism and just say its not fair and such. this is not true. if youd work as you should you would be better off, sure it is set up so that unless you have money, you cant make money. lifes not fair deal with it. but if you work hard enough you can make that money and go to collage. there are those exempt few who do this and guess what? THEY SUCCEED!!! suprising what you can do wrn you get up off that lazy ass of yours. 7. believe it or not, there were indeed irish slaves.
that is all have a great day ^.^


 

Whoa, you made some concrete points. Props my friend.


 

“In a study done by Eduardo Bonilla-Silva, most of the White interviewees said that they would not support a family member marrying a Black person (Bonilla-Silva, 2000). ”

Now why doesn’t that surprise me…wonder what the ethnic background of his study group was? *hint* They probably would only offer grudging support to a family member marrying outside their ethnic group (which is also considered non-white in many places, much to their chagrin.)


So what? This is true of virtually all races. The majority of people of virtually every Asian culture strictly forbids marrying whites. Likewise it is frowned upon in most cultures here in Africa. Likewise amongst Islams. Jews are often against going out with non-Jews. Etc. etc. Whites are almost certainly the most permissive of all races in the ENTIRE WORLD when it comes to marrying other races.

But don’t bother about reality, just go ahead with your “only whites are bad” hate-filled delusion. I now return to your regular scheduled white-hating.


i agree david. most of these cultures don’t want marriage outside culture bc to have a happy marriage, they need like-mindedness, similar beliefs and values. for us homegrown americans, (yes that means you sweetie, you know who you are) they differ from region to race to individual to religion. it’s not a biblical sin to marry outside of your race, only a cultural one…one that is dying with an aged population who “just weren’t raised that way.” but interracial marriage is hard, marriage of the same race is hard enough. when you die, all that matters is did you love enough? God won’t ask you did you love only whites or blacks or asians, etc.


(Comments wont nest below this level)
 

holy shit i think i love you ^.^ exactly my point thanks for this view on the matter.


(Comments wont nest below this level)
 

“The majority of people of virtually every Asian culture strictly forbids marrying whites. ”

Not true. It’s known amongst us asians that many asian parents prefer their daughters to marry; 1) White, or 2) Asian. What they forbid their daughters to marry are blacks or Mexicans.

“Whites are almost certainly the most permissive of all races in the ENTIRE WORLD when it comes to marrying other races.”

Not necessarily true either. There is documented proof that Chinese immigrant workers, only being able to return to China at a high cost, stayed in the US and married not only whites, but blacks, and Hawaiians.


(Comments wont nest below this level)

Um, really, so you think comparing a section of a few decades worth of data regarding immigrant Chinese is the same as comparison at the scale of universal history? Do you even understand the point here? What David is saying–this doesn’t mean he’s right–is that, over the course of human history, on the largest scale, Caucasians have been the most willing to mate outside of their own race. That is a debatable point, sure, but do you understand that you haven’t even addressed his point by citing figures about Chinese immigration–which you haven’t even really done here because you haven’t actually produced the data. Do you understand that your response is like saying “purple” if somebody asks you how to get to Miami, Florida? I suppose that you don’t, and just think you are being attacked here–which you are, in a way, yes, but the main problem here is that you haven’t demonstrated a capacity to think to me.


 
 
 
 

So you hate white privilige. OK. NOW WHAT. What do we DO about it?? If those systems and programs only benefit White people, do you advocate deleting them? I work hard but I need my food stamps, thanks.

Look, I agree with some of what you said, but screaming eloquently about the history of racism and oppression really doesn’t do any good. It just fosters hate, resentment, it punishes everybody for the sins of the fathers.

Teaching your fancy words in an inner-city school would do a lot more good than screaming about white privilege when half of white people are too young or too poor to do anything but resent you for it.

We don’t all have to live in the past. Or do we?

What do we DO now?

im ME not history


true oh so true. if we are the majority of corse most of the rulers of that nation will be said majority. comprehende?*spanish for do you follow **probably not spelled correctly lol


 
 

good try portnoy. your antisemitism is scarcely veiled.


 

LaBoheme killed it. Nicely done sir/madame. The definition of White has gotten looser and looser as time goes on to include new ethnic groups, basically to maintain an in-group and an out-group. That’s how Whiteness stays alive. Now many Near Easterners (Persians, Turks, etc.) are classified as “Caucasian” under the census. Due to current geo-politics we’re not quite there yet, but soon they’ll have membership in the White club too as long as it keeps the black/brown/yellow out-groups intact.


this ive never known O.o persians are not white O.O


 
 

did this just quote the ENTIRE text from LaMoron LaBoheme?


LOL at Adam Ant. That’s not even a coherent sentence.


add a comma after LaMoron then it makes sence (somewhat)


(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 

Honestly, it was a Canadian study & article I found on MSN.ca. It’s quite possible that Canadian whites are different, (less… isolated, I suppose?) at least in this point in time.


It’s also possible that LaBoheme misinterpreted what you typed. 1 in 4 people having dated or currently dating
someone of another race is not the same thing as 1 in 4
of all relationships being interracial.


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

i hate black apologists. this guy makes
6 figs and married a white woman.


marrying a white woman make him any higher class???


Depends on the perspective of which you view the matter. To his black peers he is generally shunned (to some he is actually raised in status.) To the sister of the woman he married he is sometimes raised higher ( depending on the relationship of the sister and the wife) and to whites he is generally the same.


 
 
 

and all blacks are better basketball players.

stop watching the news. white people don’t end up being ceo’s. they end up behind desks or working construction…give me a break.


rule #1:Dont use all, always, or never there is always an exception, except for this rule.


 

Actually, what he said is that most CEOs are white, not that most whites are CEOs.


 
 

Actually, the majority of whites are NOT in the upper class. The upper class is the smallest minority on the planet. Now, the majority of the upper class is white, but most white people are poor or middle class.


true same as i said because we have more people we also have the majority of most things.


 

Being in the middle class sucks no matter what race you are, as you’re part of the group that pays for all the social programs to “fix” the things the upper class feels guilty about.


Um…Meh? The middle class pays almost no taxes. Google what you’re talking about before you reveal that you’re an idiot. Oops…too late.


Theres a saying for this situation. The wise is silent and lets you think he’s an idiot, the fool opens his mouth and proves it.


 

Word, its the working-class that are stuck with the middle and upper classes’ broken social programs, and thereby the taxpayers, although I dont think they deserve the feeling of guilt, those tax-pushing pinches.


 

Oh yes, prove your intelligence by using Google!


a valid point. try a dictionary ^.^


 
 
 
Portnoy's complaint on May 29, 2008 at 5:29 pm

jay koo, you sure know alot about Whites, and you know the term “white privilege” too?

People who know these kinds of things are professional racists. The vast majority of people who study “Racism”, know what “Racism” is, etc., are non-Whites.

It’s laughable that Whites are racist. Professional racists and academic race-studies professors are the real racists, and they are non-whites pushing anti-White bigotry under the disguise of scholarly study.


True to an extent but still think before you type because you continue to contradict, and/or repeat yourself.


 

Portnoy – You continue to amuse me. You are so ignorant and easily mislead. Keep up the good work. LoL!


 

Dear Portnoy,

Ahahahahaha….hahahahaha….
Ha. Ha. Ha.

My sides, they hurt. Poor fellow, your life is full of sorrow and woe, isn’t it?

Stuff *angry* white people like: sad and twisted logic.


Portnoy is easily one of the best posters on this site. Every time he posts people jump up to illustrate the entire point of the site–without getting that that is what they are doing! Talk about brilliant performance art.


 

Dont judge us by our worst example. -_-


 
 

stay off the piute juice big fella, the brain cells are fading


 
 
 

same with this guy too.


 
 
 
 

JESUS WAS A BLACK MAN LYNCHED ITALIAN STYLE.

http://www.tucc.org


The Lord Jesus was a white Jewish Rabbi, not black, like it or not.


 

TUCC. You’re a douche. Why do you keep posting that?
You are offending me and I am not even white….Whats wrong with you my brotha?


 
laugh all day on May 28, 2008 at 2:07 pm

Hey Dude, Can you come up with a different phrase ? something like…”hey evevrybody, i’m an idiot”


was that exactly how he was to say it? i believe if he is as simple-minded as this he would be able to mis-spell everybody himself.


 
 
 

Why do you always post this? You’re a dumbass.


i dispise simple-minded rich punks like you. hows that?


 

Jones, when you get offended, I get offended.

“The best offense is a good defense” Jack Dempsey


Portnoy's complaint on May 28, 2008 at 9:06 pm

I don’t think Whites get offended that easily. Considering how much ridicule and under-the-radar is directed at Whites by the “mitch mutchnick” -pricks of the world, I’s say Whites are the LEAST easy to offend.


Yeah accept when we get offended thousands of people die, not just the ones who offended us. We let the small stuff go, but if you really piss us off, then you can expect death on a large scale.


 

what are you smoking? white people are by far the easiest group of people to offend on behalf of someone else.


hehe, this reminds me on a show i watched this guy was joking, but it was kind of racists, however the guy was a comedian, he jokes on all races equally, so what do you expect. but he made a joke pointed towards white people and they caught a shot where everyone was laughing but this one white guy looked somewhat upset. I cracked up at the fact that the guy couldn’t take it as a joke. hehe, but you should know that not all people go under one title. not everyone of a specific race goes under that one shallow description.


 

This site is hilarious! I especially adore all of you take what is written so seriously…really people…lighten up (HA! No pun intended) although I do have to agree with Lauraa on this one…my white friends are the ONLY group of people I know to become offended on the behalf of someone else. LOL!

http://www.msfriendly.wordpress.com


thanks for the advertisement i really needed that -_-
very funny “god” -____________-


(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 

I agree so much clander! So many white mortals were offended by the fact that I said I hate dead soldiers on Memorial Day. Lighten up losers!

http://stuffgodhates.wordpress.com/2008/05/26/24-dead-soldiers/

and oh yes…

I HATE YOU TUCC!!! :x


Blue-Eyed Columbus on May 29, 2008 at 5:17 am

I laugh at those white people who get upset whenever I’m wearing a Washington Redskins t-shirt with the savage for a logo. I’ve had a few people tell me the t-shirt is racist. Most savages would be proud one of their own is a mascot for a sports team. Their culture makes little if any contributions elsewhere.


lucabrightwater on October 18, 2009 at 9:16 am

they died


(Comments wont nest below this level)
 

After reading Howard Zinn in my AP US History class in high school, my best friend and I were enraged by the massacre of the Arawak Indians spurred by the voyage of Columbus. Naturally, we decided to boycott Columbus Day by making cute little t-shirts to wear to school that said things like “Genocide is not the trait of a hero,” and knew that we were very effective and superiorly aware.


(Comments wont nest below this level)
thoughtful person on August 19, 2009 at 1:31 pm

that’s great! that’s a good line! although, it appears some people on this forum think that genocide falls under the category of “heroic”. it’s amazing that we can all coexist in this wonderfully inclusive country, isn’t it? i’m just glad that murder is illegal, because i’m pretty sure conservatives would be alright with killing thier opposition if it was governmentally sanctioned (like it was at the time of those massacres).


 
 

You loser.


 
 

Was that a joke? I can’t believe you would be serious. I’ll assume that you are joking because I can’t imagine someone would say that.


(Comments wont nest below this level)
 

Classy.


(Comments wont nest below this level)

Portnoy, what the hell are you talking about?


 
Portnoy's complaint on May 29, 2008 at 5:31 pm

Liberal Whites need to read about the Navajo raids and google it.

They probably are happy that Whites were murdered, their children stolen, wives raped.

But wait until they read the Navajo did this to the Hispanic that lived there at that same time. Maybe then they’ll wake up.


 

White liberals in Denver love to get offended on behalf of Native Americans over Columbus Day. They like to say the holiday is racist. Celebrating it is a fun way to piss off liberals. It’s great!


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Pages: « 8111 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 [1] Show All

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)